Gigabyte GA-Z270P-D3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 38%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics84.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive39.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (73%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemGigabyte Z270P-D3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z270P-D3-CF  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180410
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateDec 04 '23 at 13:40
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User MDA-User
Background CPU 73%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
38% Below average
Memory 52.3
1-Core 94.7
2-Core 178
59% 108 Pts
4-Core 134
8-Core 162
19% 148 Pts
64-Core 162
10% 162 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 38%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Device(7377 0000) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 111
Parallax 101
86% 106 fps
MRender 93.8
Gravity 102
Splatting 96.9
80% 97.7 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900E13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 102 37 143 47 123 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
39.5% Below average
Read 136
Write 96.3
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 88.1
21% 95.2 MB/s
4K Read 20.1
4K Write 52.4
4K Mixed 10.7
72% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 246
DQ Write 110
DQ Mixed 100
95% 152 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 91%
Spcc Solid State Disk 120GB
54GB free
Firmware: P1108A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 133 135 140 140 136 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Read 419
Write 135
Mixed 140
SusWrite 133
45% 207 MB/s
4K Read 18.1
4K Write 73.2
4K Mixed 9.1
78% 33.5 MB/s
DQ Read 113
DQ Write 139
DQ Mixed 56.5
62% 103 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 83%
Samsung Spinpoint MP4 2.5" 250GB
125GB free
Firmware: 2AA00_00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 52 53 51 51 53 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
30.1% Below average
Read 52.9
Write 66.2
Mixed 43.8
SusWrite 51.8
40% 53.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.5
97% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 42%
Toshiba MK5061GSYN 500GB-$75
156GB free
Firmware: MH000C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 51 56 54 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
36.8% Below average
Read 74.1
Write 94.4
Mixed 22.4
SusWrite 53.8
44% 61.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
104% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851U6CJR6N-UH HMA851U6AFR6N-UH 8GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
49.8% Average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 20.8
MC Mixed 15.9
53% 18.7 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 10.4
SC Mixed 12.1
29% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 75%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 52 60 27" 1920 1080 ACR0744 KA272
Typical GA-Z270P-D3-CF Builds (Compare 2,456 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 46%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z270P-D3-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $508
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback