Lenovo 90L300A2FR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics140% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemLenovo 90L300A2FR  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3704
Memory20.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201130
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 03 '23 at 21:02
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900KF-$269
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
83.8% Excellent
Memory 77.1
1-Core 132
2-Core 267
86% 159 Pts
4-Core 486
8-Core 804
79% 645 Pts
64-Core 1,254
78% 1,254 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 83.8%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.67
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
140% Outstanding
Lighting 190
Reflection 168
Parallax 181
155% 180 fps
MRender 281
Gravity 148
Splatting 114
140% 181 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 140%
Great: 157%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000P3SSD8 1TB
818GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P9CR30A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,190
Write 1,839
Mixed 1,220
319% 1,416 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 74.8
4K Mixed 45.7
147% 50.9 MB/s
DQ Read 913
DQ Write 609
DQ Mixed 751
563% 758 MB/s
Poor: 102% Great: 394%
CT2000BX500SSD1 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: M6CR061
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 443
Write 368
Mixed 355
86% 388 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 59.7
4K Mixed 18.5
86% 32.9 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 265
DQ Mixed 30.2
71% 144 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 99%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
906GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 192
Write 172
Mixed 91
112% 152 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
240% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Hitachi HDS721050CLA662 500GB
453GB free
Firmware: JP2OA41A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 78.7
Write 89.2
Mixed 50
54% 72.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT16G4DFD8266.M16FE Samsung M378A2K43BB1-CPB 32GB
2667, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.3% Above average
MC Read 22
MC Write 22
MC Mixed 18.9
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 16.9
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 89.7
45% 89.7 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 23.8" 1280 720 HWV2402 HUAWEI AD80HW
Typical 90L300A2FR Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Lenovo 90L300A2FR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $240
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback