Gigabyte GA-H310M HD2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.93% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive65.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGigabyte H310MHD2
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H310M HD2  (all builds)
Memory6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '23 at 14:14
Run Duration207 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
87.7% Excellent
Memory 89.3
1-Core 116
2-Core 234
83% 147 Pts
4-Core 465
8-Core 662
71% 564 Pts
64-Core 654
40% 654 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 87.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7642
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.93% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 9
Parallax 7.5
5% 7.6 fps
MRender 10
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 10.6
8% 8.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.93%
Great: 7%
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Gigabyte(1458 36F8) 1GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
2.84% Terrible
Lighting 4.1
Reflection 3.9
Parallax 4.2
3% 4.07 fps
MRender 3.6
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 0.2
2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.84%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 960G 960GB
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0128A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 394 39 30 35 30 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
65.6% Good
Read 444
Write 349
Mixed 344
SusWrite 154
72% 323 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 66.2
4K Mixed 23.7
99% 37.3 MB/s
DQ Read 94.5
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 40.7
74% 140 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 108%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
1.5TB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 110 110 110 110 111 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
61.6% Good
Read 104
Write 98.5
Mixed 92.2
SusWrite 110
75% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
209% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 61.6%
Great: 85%
WD Red 2TB (2012)-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: 82.00A82
SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 138 138 140 142 135 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
74% Very good
Read 120
Write 117
Mixed 40.2
SusWrite 138
75% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
86% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 74%
Great: 86%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 22 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 14% Great: 101%
Asmt ASM1156-PM 1TB
270GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
16.5% Very poor
Read 35.5
Write 39.5
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 21.4
24% 32.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.3
129% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 16.5%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH Samsung M378A1K43BB2-CRC 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
73.6% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 27.4
MC Mixed 21.8
75% 26.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 21.3
61% 21.2 GB/s
Latency 66.2
60% 66.2 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 73.6%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 0" 1280 720 Default
Typical GA-H310M HD2 Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M HD2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $146
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback