Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706IU_FX706IU

Performance Results


Gaming 69% Battle cruiser	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 68% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	68.5% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706IU_FX706IU (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FA706IU
Memory	7.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210312
Uptime	12.9 Days
Run Date	Dec 02 '23 at 12:49
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 4900H 1,531 User benchmarks, average bench 74% FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	91.6% Outstanding	Memory 81.4 1-Core 148 2-Core 290 94% 173 Pts	4-Core 546 8-Core 934 90% 740 Pts	64-Core 1,361 84% 1,361 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 91.6% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile) 82,746 User benchmarks, average bench 65% Asus(1043 16FF) ≥ 4GB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.32.09 Performing below potential (73^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	68.5% Good	Lighting 86.2 Reflection 88.1 Parallax 78.3 70% 84.2 fps	MRender 93.7 Gravity 77.4 Splatting 71.4 65% 80.8 fps
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 72%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GB 17,430 User benchmarks, average bench 114% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: ECFK52.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 134 67 102 87 79 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	116% Outstanding	Read 988 Write 912 Mixed 840 SusWrite 90.1 158% 708 MB/s	4K Read 34.9 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 53.5 177% 64.4 MB/s	DQ Read 298 DQ Write 414 DQ Mixed 201 195% 304 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 116% Great: 185%
ST2000LM 015-2E8174 2TB 116 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 206GB free, PID 0237 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 79 75 83 82 82 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	36.5% Below average	Read 64.5 Write 69.6 Mixed 84.1 SusWrite 79.2 104% 74.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 0.5 128% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 36.5% Great: 52%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GB 42,443 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	99.7% Outstanding	MC Read 39.4 MC Write 37.8 MC Mixed 34.1 106% 37.1 GB/s	SC Read 19.6 SC Write 36.1 SC Mixed 22.2 74% 26 GB/s	Latency 78.8 51% 78.8 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 99.7% Great: 105%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	120	17.3"	1280 720	BOE08BE

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706IU_FX706IU Builds (Compare 60 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 18%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA706IU_FX706IU

CPU
Ryzen 7 4800HAMDBench 74%, 26,507 samples	58x
Ryzen 9 4900HAMDBench 74%, 1,531 samples	2x

GPU
RX Vega 8 4000 (iGPU)AMDBench 13%, 162,082 samples	44x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	16x

SSD
OM8PCP3512F-AB 512GBKingstonBench 114%, 17,430 samples	12x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 134%, 10,140 samples	9x
Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBWD $68Bench 204%, 97,624 samples	8x

RAM
M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GBSamsungBench 86%, 69,946 samples	25x
8ATF1G64HZ-3G2J1 2x8GBMicronBench 85%, 42,443 samples	15x
4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 2x8GBMicronBench 70%, 20,634 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $542	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16