Asus PRIME X370-A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics173% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X370-A  (all builds)
Memory11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 02 '23 at 09:31
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
69% Good
Memory 77.5
1-Core 93
2-Core 192
69% 121 Pts
4-Core 326
8-Core 611
56% 468 Pts
64-Core 1,003
62% 1,003 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 69%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6950-XT
XFX(1EAE 6950) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
173% Outstanding
Lighting 192
Reflection 261
Parallax 526
156% 326 fps
MRender 397
Gravity 218
Splatting 337
260% 317 fps
Poor: 183%
This bench: 173%
Great: 214%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A1000 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$53
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: E8FK11.R Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 657
Write 621
Mixed 548
136% 609 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 57.4
4K Mixed 31.2
109% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 576
DQ Write 392
DQ Mixed 453
346% 474 MB/s
Poor: 71% Great: 141%
Crucial MX300 275GB-$100
55GB free
Firmware: M0CR031
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 457
Write 473
Mixed 398
99% 443 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 71.3
4K Mixed 34.5
120% 43.5 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 304
221% 283 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 95%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
73GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1C2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 378
Write 208
Mixed 357
70% 314 MB/s
4K Read 28.8
4K Write 69.1
4K Mixed 33.8
124% 43.9 MB/s
DQ Read 253
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 188
173% 261 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
99.6% Outstanding
MC Read 41
MC Write 37.5
MC Mixed 31.8
105% 36.8 GB/s
SC Read 22.4
SC Write 35
SC Mixed 26.6
80% 28 GB/s
Latency 88
46% 88 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 99.6%
Great: 102%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 144 24" 1920 1017 ACI24A4 VG248
Typical PRIME X370-A Builds (Compare 443 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $482
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback