MSI H61M-P22 (G3) (MS-7788)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics20.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemMSI MS-7788
MotherboardMSI H61M-P22 (G3) (MS-7788)  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colores, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131018
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateDec 02 '23 at 07:55
Run Duration219 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 84.1
2-Core 164
64% 110 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 280
37% 276 Pts
64-Core 273
17% 273 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R7 360-$100
CLim: 1170 MHz, MLim: 1625 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.Q1.2
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
20.6% Poor
Lighting 25.4
Reflection 27.2
Parallax 30.6
21% 27.7 fps
MRender 24.9
Gravity 23.1
Splatting 26.1
20% 24.7 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 20.6%
Great: 20%
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
MSI(1462 7788) 2.2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.09% Terrible
Lighting 0.8
Reflection 2.1
Parallax 1.7
1% 1.53 fps
MRender 3.2
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2.7
2% 2.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.09%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000LUCX-63UAUY0 500GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 39 21 23 32 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
25.8% Poor
Read 60.7
Write 82
Mixed 44.2
SusWrite 28.8
40% 53.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 63%
Samsung HD320KJ 320GB
18GB free
Firmware: CP100-10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 25 25 24 25 26 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 45%
Hitachi HTS542512K9SA00 120GB-$25
53GB free
Firmware: BB2OC31P
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 44 44 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
27.1% Poor
Read 51
Write 42.4
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 43.2
30% 40.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
105% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 27.1%
Great: 31%
VendorCo ProductCode 32GB
26GB free, PID 5678
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.7 7.7 7.5 4.9 7.5 7.1 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 250
Write 4
Mixed 2.5
SusWrite 6.6
46% 65.7 MB/s
4K Read 44.6
4K Mixed 0
248% 22.3 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 23%
Hitachi HTS54323 320GB
113GB free, PID 1068
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 23 23 24 23 23 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 57.3
Write 25.2
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 23.3
39% 32.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.5
31% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 26%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 12GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
33% Below average
MC Read 11.1
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 10.5
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 10.1
28% 9.83 GB/s
Latency 81.9
49% 81.9 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 33%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 4 194 27 60 0" 1360 768 XXX0000 MS82VG
Typical H61M-P22 (G3) (MS-7788) Builds (Compare 39 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI H61M-P22 (G3) (MS-7788)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback