Biostar B250MHC

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Biostar B250MHC (all builds)
Memory	9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20201022
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 01 '23 at 19:06
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7600-$89 39,689 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	70.6% Very good	Memory 86.2 1-Core 120 2-Core 232 82% 146 Pts	4-Core 313 8-Core 359 44% 336 Pts	64-Core 370 23% 370 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 740 30,433 User benchmarks, average bench 7% Nvidia(10DE 1099) ≥ 4GB CLim: 993 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	3.04% Terrible	Lighting 0.2 Reflection 10.9 Parallax 10.9 0% 7.33 fps	MRender 12.6 Gravity 11 Splatting 8.8 9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 3.04% Great: 8%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Tech POWER LP330 512GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 173GB free (System drive) Firmware: FW20110A SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 3.9 3.5 23 36 2.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	29.1% Poor	Read 425 Write 127 Mixed 5.5 SusWrite 15 31% 143 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.2 42% 9.73 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 78%
P4-480 480GB 851 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 161GB free Firmware: SN11873 SusWrite @10s intervals: 429 377 41 28 31 32 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	80.5% Excellent	Read 427 Write 421 Mixed 405 SusWrite 156 79% 352 MB/s	4K Read 35 4K Write 73.2 4K Mixed 38.3 141% 48.8 MB/s	DQ Read 183 DQ Write 292 DQ Mixed 254 188% 243 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 80.5% Great: 106%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown JHD3000U1916JG 1x16GB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.3% Average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 14.7 MC Mixed 11.8 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 12.9 SC Write 13.7 SC Mixed 10.2 35% 12.3 GB/s	Latency 79 51% 79 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 41.3% Great: 58%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	22"	1680 987	SAM03E4 SyncMaster

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B250MHC Builds (Compare 232 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar B250MHC

CPU
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	29x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	28x
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	24x

GPU
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	25x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	21x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	20x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	12x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	10x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $79Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	8x

RAM
CT4G4DFS8213.C8FBD1 02B5 QUM4U-4G2400C16 8GBUnknownBench 76%, 6 samples	6x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBCorsairBench 75%, 46,470 samples	5x
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $127

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16