Medion H77H2-EM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics41.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive44.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (68%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMedion H77H2-EM  (all builds)
MotherboardMEDION H77H2-EM
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120424
Uptime31 Days
Run DateNov 29 '23 at 09:22
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 68%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
70.4% Very good
Memory 87.7
1-Core 92.5
2-Core 173
70% 118 Pts
4-Core 288
8-Core 437
45% 362 Pts
64-Core 424
26% 424 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Nvidia(10DE 1320) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (48th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.6% Average
Lighting 54.1
Reflection 54.7
Parallax 47.4
44% 52.1 fps
MRender 40.6
Gravity 49.2
Splatting 44.3
37% 44.7 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
636GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 168 217 220 63 52 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.9% Average
Read 222
Write 216
Mixed 211
SusWrite 124
44% 193 MB/s
4K Read 12.4
4K Write 40.4
4K Mixed 18.4
64% 23.7 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 185
141% 191 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 133%
WD Elements 500GB
286GB free, PID 1023
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 25 25 26 23 25 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 60.6
Write 17.7
Mixed 17
SusWrite 24.9
34% 30.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.3
18% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 41%
WD Elements 1TB
931GB free, PID 1042
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 107 107 107 104 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 103
Write 99.3
Mixed 34.3
SusWrite 107
114% 86 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.4
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 43%
ST1500DL 003-9VT16L 1.5TB
1TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 88 91 86 90 85 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
47.5% Average
Read 86.8
Write 90.1
Mixed 24.6
SusWrite 88.9
96% 72.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5
4K Mixed 0.4
186% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 1600 C11 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
54.5% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 17.2
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 16.8
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 73.1
55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 27" 1280 720 PHLC18F PHL 276E8V
Typical H77H2-EM Builds (Compare 181 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Medion H77H2-EM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $547
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback