Asus TUF Gaming FX705DT_FX705DT

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics42.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus TUF Gaming FX705DT_FX705DT  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX705DT
Memory3.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210128
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateNov 28 '23 at 05:20
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3750H
FP5, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
44% Average
Memory 48.7
1-Core 82.5
2-Core 151
52% 94 Pts
4-Core 212
8-Core 370
35% 291 Pts
64-Core 353
22% 353 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 44%
Great: 67%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile)
Asus(1043 10CF) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.5% Average
Lighting 55.3
Reflection 60.4
Parallax 49.3
45% 55 fps
MRender 40.8
Gravity 48.6
Splatting 47.3
38% 45.6 fps
Poor: 28%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 46%
AMD Radeon RX Vega 10 Graphics
Asus(1043 18F1) 128MB
Ram: 128MB, Driver: 21.20.25.02
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Lighting 15.4
Reflection 12.5
Parallax 24.4
13% 17.4 fps
MRender 9
Gravity 20.3
Splatting 13.5
12% 14.3 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 14%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
97GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 203 51 85 49 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
96.7% Outstanding
Read 906
Write 654
Mixed 630
SusWrite 97.2
127% 571 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 60.3
4K Mixed 34.5
122% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 326
DQ Write 434
DQ Mixed 220
211% 326 MB/s
Poor: 94%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 209%
WD WD20SPZX-11CRAT0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 104 102 101 101 102 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 81.5
Write 91.9
Mixed 55.3
SusWrite 102
61% 82.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
147% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CTD BLS8G4S26BFSDK.8FD 16GB
2667, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
57.7% Above average
MC Read 20.8
MC Write 21.2
MC Mixed 21.3
60% 21.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 20.7
SC Mixed 15.8
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 128
31% 128 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 15: 0P 1R 2G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
15% 23% 30 153 3 144 23.8" 1280 720 YCT6885 F2465P
Typical TUF Gaming FX705DT_FX705DT Builds (Compare 490 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus TUF Gaming FX705DT_FX705DT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback