Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics13.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive149% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B75M-D3H  (all builds)
Memory10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit색, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20131023
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateNov 27 '23 at 06:31
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3570 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 92.1
2-Core 181
71% 121 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 336
44% 331 Pts
64-Core 317
20% 317 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 75%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.46% Terrible
Lighting 1.6
Reflection 1.8
Parallax 1.4
1% 1.6 fps
MRender 3.4
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2.1
2% 2.2 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.46%
Great: 2%
Nvidia GT 1030
Zotac(19DA 2476) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Lighting 17.1
Reflection 16.4
Parallax 16.8
14% 16.8 fps
MRender 14.4
Gravity 17.7
Splatting 15.1
13% 15.7 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 15%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC711 HFM256GD3JX013N 256GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 480 428 471 412 424 331 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
149% Outstanding
Read 1,170
Write 989
Mixed 926
SusWrite 424
196% 877 MB/s
4K Read 40.9
4K Write 71.3
4K Mixed 50.9
165% 54.4 MB/s
DQ Read 712
DQ Write 379
DQ Mixed 506
386% 532 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 149%
Great: 254%
Transcend TS1TMTS830S 1TB
647GB free
Firmware: 02J0S86A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 347 361 381 374 348 324 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
95.5% Outstanding
Read 459
Write 420
Mixed 376
SusWrite 356
91% 403 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 60.3
4K Mixed 38.8
127% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 335
DQ Mixed 110
150% 274 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 95.5%
Great: 115%
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
32GB free
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 194 78 66 58 55 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
55% Above average
Read 233
Write 219
Mixed 196
SusWrite 112
43% 190 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 48.1
4K Mixed 24.5
98% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 207
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 150
127% 184 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 55%
Great: 87%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$23
337GB free
Firmware: 17.01H17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 83 84 84 85 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
52.2% Above average
Read 98.5
Write 108
Mixed 68
SusWrite 83.4
66% 89.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB HMT351U6CFR8C-PB HMT351U6EFR8C-PB HMT351U6EFR8C-PB 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.3% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 15
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 14.6
42% 14.6 GB/s
Latency 66.3
60% 66.3 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 57 0 17" 1280 720 SAM0381 SyncMaster
Typical GA-B75M-D3H Builds (Compare 3,891 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H - $80

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $405
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback