MSI PRO Z690-A WIFI DDR4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics123% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive143% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D25
MotherboardMSI PRO Z690-A WIFI DDR4  (all builds)
Memory19 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220517
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 26 '23 at 18:28
Run Duration235 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 76%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12600K-$159
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
56% Above average
Memory 59.9
1-Core 106
2-Core 208
67% 124 Pts
4-Core 286
8-Core 377
42% 331 Pts
64-Core 367
23% 367 Pts
Poor: 100%
This bench: 56%
Great: 117%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
123% Outstanding
Lighting 160
Reflection 200
Parallax 208
130% 189 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 148
Splatting 130
125% 157 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 123%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 853 658 666 669 668 654 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
143% Outstanding
Read 1,147
Write 1,169
Mixed 910
SusWrite 695
220% 980 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 59.4
4K Mixed 32.1
109% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 668
DQ Write 279
DQ Mixed 421
326% 456 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 143%
Great: 340%
Crucial M500 480GB-$81
200GB free
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 355 371 325 315 319 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 310
Write 307
Mixed 281
SusWrite 336
70% 308 MB/s
4K Read 11.2
4K Write 37.9
4K Mixed 16.3
58% 21.8 MB/s
DQ Read 330
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 179
165% 256 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 100%
SanDisk X400 512GB-$99
338GB free
Firmware: X4140000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 321 298 300 291 295 295 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
67% Good
Read 331
Write 338
Mixed 266
SusWrite 300
70% 308 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 43
4K Mixed 20.8
73% 26.5 MB/s
DQ Read 351
DQ Write 228
DQ Mixed 228
187% 269 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 67%
Great: 104%
Samsung MZVLB512HBJQ-000L7 512GB
242GB free
Firmware: 4M2QEXF7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1191 1161 795 802 801 801 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
160% Outstanding
Read 1,188
Write 1,185
Mixed 965
SusWrite 925
240% 1,066 MB/s
4K Read 24.6
4K Write 62
4K Mixed 34.9
115% 40.5 MB/s
DQ Read 708
DQ Write 219
DQ Mixed 435
328% 454 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 160%
Great: 347%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DDR4 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
90.4% Outstanding
MC Read 36.1
MC Write 36.6
MC Mixed 34.9
102% 35.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 14.3
44% 15.5 GB/s
Latency 131
31% 131 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 90.4%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 165 31.5" 1280 720 GSM7766 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical PRO Z690-A WIFI DDR4(MS-7D25) Builds (Compare 11,313 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 208%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 229%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI PRO Z690-A WIFI DDR4 - $117

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 120% - Outstanding Total price: $942
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback