Asus ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 124%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory56.1 GB free of 64 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220812
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 26 '23 at 13:21
Run Duration350 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900K-$277
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
124% Outstanding
Memory 88.9
1-Core 218
2-Core 434
128% 247 Pts
4-Core 855
8-Core 1,589
146% 1,222 Pts
64-Core 2662
165% 2662 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 124%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$435
EVGA(3842 4897) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 546.17
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 227
Reflection 314
Parallax 238
185% 259 fps
Gravity 236
Splatting 174
177% 205 fps
Poor: 163% Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$121
59GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QJXD7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,652
Write 4,839
Mixed 3504
828% 3665 MB/s
4K Read 82.1
4K Write 341
4K Mixed 132
474% 185 MB/s
DQ Read 2,208
DQ Write 1775
DQ Mixed 1,969
1,480% 1,984 MB/s
Poor: 278% Great: 521%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
219GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 222 222 272 331 350 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 378
Write 402
Mixed 371
SusWrite 269
80% 355 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 55.6
191% 68.6 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 228
170% 227 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 101%
Great: 129%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
191GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1107 847 846 847 847 847 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
370% Outstanding
Read 2648
Write 2,419
Mixed 1,933
SusWrite 890
441% 1,973 MB/s
4K Read 76.4
4K Write 259
4K Mixed 114
399% 150 MB/s
DQ Read 1,918
DQ Write 1,958
DQ Mixed 2,072
1,520% 1,983 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 370%
Great: 340%
SSV5 480GB
140GB free
Firmware: T0813A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 206 202 202 144 80 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
54.1% Above average
Read 375
Write 372
Mixed 79.1
SusWrite 149
54% 244 MB/s
4K Read 34.2
4K Write 43.6
4K Mixed 3.3
79% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 192
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 1.8
54% 130 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 103%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$157
531GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1823 1627 1634 1630 1633 1623 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
438% Outstanding
Read 2,768
Write 2,512
Mixed 1983
SusWrite 1,662
500% 2,231 MB/s
4K Read 77.9
4K Write 280
4K Mixed 118
418% 159 MB/s
DQ Read 2,383
DQ Write 1,987
DQ Mixed 2,147
1,619% 2,172 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 438%
Great: 372%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$25
483GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 171 172 168 168 172 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
93.5% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 136
Mixed 88.9
SusWrite 168
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF560C40-16 KF556C36-16 KF560C40-16 KF556C36-16 64GB
6000, 6000, 6000, 6000 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
196% Outstanding
MC Read 78.3
MC Write 79.5
MC Mixed 74.2
221% 77.3 GB/s
SC Read 24.4
SC Write 49.7
SC Mixed 35.2
104% 36.4 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 183%
This bench: 196%
Great: 197%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 240 31.5" 1280 720 SAM7058 LC32G7xT
Typical ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 6,368 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 232%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 273%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $1,027
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback