Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 122%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory55.2 GB free of 64 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit väriä
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220812
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 25 '23 at 20:38
Run Duration402 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-12900K-$265
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Memory 89.7
1-Core 207
2-Core 411
123% 236 Pts
4-Core 822
8-Core 1,598
143% 1,210 Pts
64-Core 2,835
175% 2,835 Pts
Poor: 107%
This bench: 122%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$751
EVGA(3842 4897) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 546.17
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 234
Reflection 316
Parallax 240
191% 264 fps
Gravity 240
Splatting 176
179% 208 fps
Poor: 163% Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$98
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,506
Write 1,455
Mixed 1,061
368% 1674 MB/s
4K Read 69.8
4K Write 243
4K Mixed 101
364% 138 MB/s
DQ Read 980
DQ Write 1,505
DQ Mixed 1,014
832% 1,167 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
219GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 217 220 335 350 348 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 372
Write 400
Mixed 367
SusWrite 281
80% 355 MB/s
4K Read 40.6
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 56.1
191% 68.4 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 227
170% 227 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 102%
Great: 129%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
191GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1220 844 846 844 846 845 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
366% Outstanding
Read 2,652
Write 2,489
Mixed 1,924
SusWrite 908
446% 1,993 MB/s
4K Read 75.6
4K Write 250
4K Mixed 109
387% 145 MB/s
DQ Read 1,916
DQ Write 1,903
DQ Mixed 2,005
1,480% 1,941 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 366%
Great: 340%
SSV5 480GB
140GB free
Firmware: T0813A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 200 200 76 59 62 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
66.7% Good
Read 376
Write 365
Mixed 119
SusWrite 134
55% 248 MB/s
4K Read 33.8
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 12.7
123% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 195
DQ Mixed 2.6
56% 133 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 66.7%
Great: 103%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
531GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1829 1630 1627 1632 1627 1624 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
430% Outstanding
Read 2,748
Write 2,264
Mixed 1,957
SusWrite 1,662
484% 2,158 MB/s
4K Read 75.9
4K Write 274
4K Mixed 113
405% 154 MB/s
DQ Read 2318
DQ Write 1,909
DQ Mixed 2,041
1,548% 2,089 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 430%
Great: 372%
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 1TB-$100
931GB free
Firmware: 3B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4424 4420 3389 1743 1752 1722 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
514% Outstanding
Read 3,025
Write 4,417
Mixed 3,280
SusWrite 2,908
772% 3,407 MB/s
4K Read 72.3
4K Write 280
4K Mixed 116
406% 156 MB/s
DQ Read 2247
DQ Write 1,803
DQ Mixed 2,012
1,510% 2,021 MB/s
Poor: 275%
This bench: 514%
Great: 507%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
483GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 171 171 169 170 172 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
93.8% Outstanding
Read 158
Write 122
Mixed 86.6
SusWrite 169
98% 134 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 93.8%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF560C40-16 KF556C36-16 KF560C40-16 KF556C36-16 64GB
6000, 6000, 6000, 6000 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
197% Outstanding
MC Read 78.3
MC Write 79.7
MC Mixed 74.5
221% 77.5 GB/s
SC Read 25
SC Write 52.3
SC Mixed 36.8
109% 38 GB/s
Latency 67.4
59% 67.4 ns
Poor: 183%
This bench: 197%
Great: 197%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 240 31.5" 1280 720 SAM7058 LC32G7xT
Typical ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 6,650 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 232%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 273%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $1,200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback