Gigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 155% UFO	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 190% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	203% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte X399 DESIGNARE EX
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF (all builds)
Memory	58.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	5120 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20211130
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 26 '23 at 13:19
Run Duration	180 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225 23,641 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	78.3% Very good	Memory 71.3 1-Core 117 2-Core 228 76% 139 Pts	4-Core 457 8-Core 909 81% 683 Pts	64-Core 2,203 136% 2,203 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 78.3% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$550 45,585 User benchmarks, average bench 190% Gigabyte(1458 40ED) CLim: 3135 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 546.01 Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	203% Outstanding	Lighting 291 Reflection 270 Parallax 327 237% 296 fps	MRender 371 Gravity 247 Splatting 193 212% 270 fps
Poor: 162% ↑ This bench: 203% Great: 205%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 94GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,632 Write 1,652 Mixed 908 380% 1,730 MB/s	4K Read 48.9 4K Write 139 4K Mixed 67.9 234% 85.1 MB/s	DQ Read 963 DQ Write 710 DQ Mixed 779 598% 817 MB/s
Poor: 159% Great: 353%
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139 63,520 User benchmarks, average bench 266% 60GB free Firmware: 4B6Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,636 Write 1,864 Mixed 1186 418% 1,895 MB/s	4K Read 49.3 4K Write 134 4K Mixed 68.1 233% 83.9 MB/s	DQ Read 950 DQ Write 749 DQ Mixed 796 610% 832 MB/s
Poor: 159% Great: 353%
WD WD80EFZZ-68BTXN0 8TB 310 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 4TB free Firmware: 81.00A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 181 181 173 179 178 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 203 Write 181 Mixed 161 SusWrite 178 134% 181 MB/s	4K Read 7.8 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 508% 3.9 MB/s
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 121%
Sharkoon QuickPort Duo Cl 4TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 49GB free, PID 2013 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 117 117 116 117 107 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	56.2% Above average	Read 160 Write 160 Mixed 127 SusWrite 111 187% 140 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1 133% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 108%
Sharkoon QuickPort Duo Cl 4TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 55GB free, PID 2013 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 117 117 116 117 107 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	55.7% Above average	Read 158 Write 160 Mixed 127 SusWrite 111 186% 139 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 133% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 55.7% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2933 C14 4x16GB 65 User benchmarks, average bench 121% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	181% Outstanding	MC Read 73.1 MC Write 74.6 MC Mixed 71.5 209% 73.1 GB/s	SC Read 17.5 SC Write 41 SC Mixed 27.6 82% 28.7 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 181% Great: 180%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	72	60	60	34.1"	1280 720	GSM7720 LG HDR 5K

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF Builds (Compare 214 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 123%

UFO

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 137%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X399 DESIGNARE EX-CF

CPU
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	56x
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	54x
Ryzen TR 2950XAMD $1,075Bench 81%, 10,169 samples	47x

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	18x
RTX 3090Nvidia $1,198Bench 210%, 158,856 samples	18x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	12x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $93Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	15x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	13x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TBSamsung $159Bench 336%, 200,600 samples	10x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBG.SKILL $139Bench 95%, 14,506 samples	8x
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 8x8GBG.SKILLBench 125%, 648 samples	7x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 8x8GBCorsairBench 124%, 361 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $1,473

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159	Nvidia RTX 4060 $290	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $109	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16