Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI_FA707XI

Performance Results


Gaming 50% Yacht	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 57% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	55.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	125% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 months ago, 6 months ago.

System	Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI_FA707XI (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK FA707XI
Memory	55.5 GB free of 64 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20230911
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 25 '23 at 12:56
Run Duration	193 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 7940HS 2,231 User benchmarks, average bench 86% FP8, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	75.4% Very good	Memory 53.2 1-Core 180 2-Core 363 100% 199 Pts	4-Core 521 8-Core 1,023 91% 772 Pts	64-Core 1,684 104% 1,684 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 75.4% Great: 110%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon 780M 1,815 User benchmarks, average bench 36% Asus(1043 23DD) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.40.70.06 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	55.1% Above average	Lighting 64.9 Reflection 21.4 Parallax 101 53% 62.5 fps	MRender 24.8 Gravity 83.6 Splatting 96.3 59% 68.2 fps
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 55.1% Great: 53%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM 512GB 5,198 User benchmarks, average bench 192% 354GB free (System drive) Firmware: V3MA003 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1150 774 75 77 72 77 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	125% Outstanding	Read 1,044 Write 1,086 Mixed 1,125 SusWrite 371 204% 906 MB/s	4K Read 34.4 4K Write 49.4 4K Mixed 26.1 112% 36.6 MB/s	DQ Read 898 DQ Write 326 DQ Mixed 737 512% 654 MB/s
Poor: 124% ↑ This bench: 125% Great: 252%
Kingston SFYRD2000G 2TB 6,356 User benchmarks, average bench 463% 1.5TB free Firmware: EIFK31.6 SusWrite @10s intervals: 4027 4082 4117 4028 3785 3946 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	466% Outstanding	Read 2620 Write 3,730 Mixed 2,906 SusWrite 3,997 752% 3,313 MB/s	4K Read 45.2 4K Write 92.8 4K Mixed 63.5 199% 67.2 MB/s	DQ Read 1,480 DQ Write 987 DQ Mixed 1,443 1,020% 1,303 MB/s
Poor: 274% ↑ This bench: 466% Great: 614%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905789-037.A00G 9905789-059.A00G 63GB 4800, 4800 MHz 32767, 32767 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	133% Outstanding	MC Read 52 MC Write 41.7 MC Mixed 51 138% 48.2 GB/s	SC Read 39.3 SC Write 46.4 SC Mixed 47.3 127% 44.3 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 9: 0P 1R 1G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
14%	8%	78	389	70	60	27"	1280 720	PHLC208 PHL 271E1

History: Score 14: 0P 2R 0G 4B | Score 9: 0P 1R 1G 1B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI_FA707XI Builds (Compare 12 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 117%

UFO

Desktop 95%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 122%

UFO

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming A17 FA707XI_FA707XI

CPU
Ryzen 9 7940HSAMDBench 86%, 2,231 samples	12x

GPU
RTX 4070 (Laptop)NvidiaBench 132%, 10,174 samples	6x
Radeon 780MAMDBench 36%, 1,815 samples	6x

SSD
PC SN560 SDDPNQE-1T00-1002 1TBWDBench 364%, 853 samples	3x
Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM 512GBBench 192%, 5,198 samples	3x
PC SN740 SDDPNQE-2T00-1002 2TBWDBench 392%, 9 samples	2x

RAM
HMCG66MEBSA095N 2x8GBHynixBench 122%, 2,593 samples	5x
M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GBSamsungBench 120%, 26,893 samples	3x
CT16G48C40S5.M8A1 2x16GBCrucialBench 133%, 4,167 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16