HP Pavilion Desktop TP01-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive238% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Desktop TP01-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8643
Memory56 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230707
Uptime3.6 Days
Run DateNov 24 '23 at 11:58
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$99
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 70.1
1-Core 118
2-Core 231
76% 140 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 599
63% 505 Pts
64-Core 607
38% 607 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics
HP(103C 8643) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
18.8% Very poor
Lighting 24.5
Reflection 18.8
Parallax 34.1
20% 25.8 fps
MRender 15
Gravity 29.5
Splatting 17
17% 20.5 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.8%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
832GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1179 1205 1196 1220 1214 1217 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
238% Outstanding
Read 1,417
Write 1,193
Mixed 1,161
SusWrite 1,205
280% 1,244 MB/s
4K Read 55.5
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 70.7
229% 76.3 MB/s
DQ Read 965
DQ Write 653
DQ Mixed 769
585% 796 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 238%
Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
543GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2130 2160 1483 1473 1484 1490 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
307% Outstanding
Read 2,356
Write 2,186
Mixed 1,752
SusWrite 1,703
449% 1,999 MB/s
4K Read 56.8
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 72.2
238% 80.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,010
DQ Write 561
DQ Mixed 816
599% 796 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 307%
Great: 410%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 141 151 154 152 147 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
69.5% Good
Read 94.1
Write 142
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 148
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
84% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69.5%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 144 151 153 150 148 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 94.3
Write 122
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 149
80% 110 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
72% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 90%
Samsung SSD 980 500GB
47GB free, PID 9210
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 40 40 40 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
60.7% Good
Read 50.7
Write 37.9
Mixed 38.1
SusWrite 39.4
55% 41.5 MB/s
4K Read 20.4
4K Write 13
4K Mixed 16.8
1,089% 16.7 MB/s
DQ Read 17.1
DQ Write 21
DQ Mixed 18.5
1,407% 18.9 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 60.7%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CP32G4DFRA32A.C16FF 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
MC Read 36.8
MC Write 36.4
MC Mixed 33.6
102% 35.6 GB/s
SC Read 24.2
SC Write 41.7
SC Mixed 29.9
91% 31.9 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 75 24.1" 1280 720 AUS2487 PA248QV
Typical Pavilion Desktop TP01-0xxx Builds (Compare 625 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Desktop TP01-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback