HP Pavilion Desktop TP01-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics18.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive242% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP Pavilion Desktop TP01-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8643
Memory57.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230707
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 20 '23 at 22:08
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3400G-$99
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 69.3
1-Core 120
2-Core 237
77% 142 Pts
4-Core 391
8-Core 564
60% 477 Pts
64-Core 584
36% 584 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon RX Vega 11 Graphics
HP(103C 8643) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
18.7% Very poor
Lighting 24.4
Reflection 18.6
Parallax 34.1
20% 25.7 fps
MRender 14.9
Gravity 29.1
Splatting 16.9
16% 20.3 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.7%
Great: 18%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
795GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1182 1208 1207 1201 1209 1213 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
242% Outstanding
Read 1,431
Write 1194
Mixed 1,175
SusWrite 1,203
281% 1,251 MB/s
4K Read 58.1
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 72.9
239% 79.8 MB/s
DQ Read 985
DQ Write 686
DQ Mixed 788
601% 819 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 242%
Great: 410%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$95
544GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2021 2165 1516 1470 1497 1489 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
314% Outstanding
Read 2482
Write 2,191
Mixed 1,795
SusWrite 1693
458% 2,040 MB/s
4K Read 58.4
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 74.9
246% 83.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,008
DQ Write 556
DQ Mixed 849
614% 804 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 314%
Great: 410%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 147 151 153 152 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
70.2% Very good
Read 96
Write 141
Mixed 66.6
SusWrite 149
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
84% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 152 153 152 148 154 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 80.2
Write 119
Mixed 74.6
SusWrite 151
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
84% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 90%
Samsung SSD 980 500GB
50GB free, PID 9210
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 40 39 39 39 40 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
61% Good
Read 50.4
Write 37.7
Mixed 38.2
SusWrite 39.4
55% 41.4 MB/s
4K Read 20.7
4K Write 13.1
4K Mixed 16.9
1,097% 16.9 MB/s
DQ Read 17.1
DQ Write 20.7
DQ Mixed 18.4
1,393% 18.7 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 61%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CP32G4DFRA32A.C16FF 2x31.5GB
2 of 2 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
99.9% Outstanding
MC Read 37.3
MC Write 37.7
MC Mixed 34
104% 36.3 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 42.2
SC Mixed 28.4
91% 31.8 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 99.9%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 75 24.1" 1280 720 AUS2487 PA248QV
Typical Pavilion Desktop TP01-0xxx Builds (Compare 625 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Desktop TP01-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 117% - Outstanding Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback