TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 258%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 247%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics250% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X370 Gaming K4  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221027
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 24 '23 at 00:13
Run Duration159 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$297
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Memory 98.1
1-Core 163
2-Core 319
106% 193 Pts
4-Core 626
8-Core 999
100% 812 Pts
64-Core 1,485
92% 1,485 Pts
Poor: 92% ↑
This bench: 107%
 Great: 111%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XTX-$1,000
Sapphire(1DA2 471E) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 24GB, Driver: 23.11.1
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
250% Outstanding
Lighting 323
Reflection 423
Parallax 710
264% 486 fps
MRender 475
Gravity 296
Splatting 437
332% 402 fps
Poor: 216% ↑
This bench: 250%
 Great: 293%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
37GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,988
Write 1,372
Mixed 629
292% 1,330 MB/s
4K Read 52.4
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 49.7
223% 84.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1058
DQ Write 991
DQ Mixed 656
594% 902 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
70GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 228 136 18 108 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 346
Write 106
Mixed 89
SusWrite 146
38% 172 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 20.5
4K Mixed 11.8
55% 17.2 MB/s
DQ Read 14.1
DQ Write 15.4
DQ Mixed 14.7
11% 14.7 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑
This bench: 39.9%
 Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95
1TB free
Firmware: CC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 96 96 96 94 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 112
Write 111
Mixed 72
SusWrite 96
72% 97.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 59.5%
 Great: 75%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1.5TB
147GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 132 134 127 127 124 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 116
Write 115
Mixed 67.2
SusWrite 128
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
145% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑
This bench: 69.8%
 Great: 95%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMU16GX4M2C3200C16 CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 CMU16GX4M2C3200C16 CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 32GB
2667, 2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
91.5% Outstanding
MC Read 42.1
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 34.6
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 27.7
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 34.5
78% 27.4 GB/s
Latency 51.7
77% 51.7 ns
Poor: 74% ↑
This bench: 91.5%
 Great: 97%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 34" 1280 720 AOC3402 U34G2G4R3
Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical X370 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD  $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples43x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD  $195Bench 71%, 66,470 samples24x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD  $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples23x
GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia  $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples19x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia  $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples16x
GTX 1070Nvidia  $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples16x
SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung  $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples8x
XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBAdata  $87Bench 279%, 85,928 samples8x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung  $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples6x
RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair  $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples11x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair  $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples7x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples6x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $524
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback