Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results


Gaming 248% UFO	Desktop 98% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 242% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	262% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

8 months ago, 7 months ago, 6 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X370 Gaming K4 (all builds)
Memory	24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20221027
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 12 '23 at 21:32
Run Duration	175 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	14%

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D-$297 20,824 User benchmarks, average bench 104% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	98.8% Outstanding	Memory 94.3 1-Core 152 2-Core 294 99% 180 Pts	4-Core 554 8-Core 974 92% 764 Pts	64-Core 1,382 86% 1,382 Pts
Poor: 92% ↑ This bench: 98.8% Great: 111%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 7900-XTX-$1,000 5,548 User benchmarks, average bench 257% Sapphire(1DA2 471E) ≥ 4GB Ram: 24GB, Driver: 23.10.1 Performing below potential (61^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	262% Outstanding	Lighting 334 Reflection 453 Parallax 773 272% 520 fps	MRender 485 Gravity 319 Splatting 500 361% 435 fps
Poor: 216% ↑ This bench: 262% Great: 293%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,847 Write 1,415 Mixed 574 281% 1,278 MB/s	4K Read 39.4 4K Write 137 4K Mixed 51.8 199% 76.1 MB/s	DQ Read 1,143 DQ Write 960 DQ Mixed 647 595% 917 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB 117 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 124GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 173 98 32 229 18 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	78.9% Very good	Read 424 Write 387 Mixed 335 SusWrite 129 71% 319 MB/s	4K Read 35.7 4K Write 79.3 4K Mixed 40.7 148% 51.9 MB/s	DQ Read 282 DQ Write 92.6 DQ Mixed 21.2 59% 132 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$95 81,608 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 1TB free Firmware: CC45 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 82 80 81 76 78 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	54.9% Above average	Read 112 Write 98.1 Mixed 65.1 SusWrite 79.6 65% 88.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.7 119% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 54.9% Great: 75%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 1.5TB 84 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 147GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 132 131 124 123 118 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	69.4% Good	Read 116 Write 118 Mixed 66.6 SusWrite 126 78% 107 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 1 156% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 69.4% Great: 95%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 32GB-$16 13,359 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 29GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 141 Write 99.1 Mixed 33.9 102% 91.5 MB/s	4K Read 4 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 2.9 127% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 10% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMU16GX4M2C3200C16 CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 CMU16GX4M2C3200C16 CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 32GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	75.6% Very good	MC Read 35.1 MC Write 16.8 MC Mixed 28 76% 26.6 GB/s	SC Read 24.2 SC Write 16.8 SC Mixed 26.3 64% 22.4 GB/s	Latency 60.5 66% 60.5 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 75.6% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	72	60	144	34"	1280 720	AOC3402 U34G2G4R3

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X370 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 196 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 75%

Battleship

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	43x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $195Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	24x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	23x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	19x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	16x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	16x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $85Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	8x
XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBAdata $87Bench 279%, 85,928 samples	8x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	6x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	11x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $48Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	7x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $515

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Gaming K4

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (41^st percentile)