MSI X470 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B78)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics59% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive308% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B78
MotherboardMSI X470 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B78)  (all builds)
Memory28.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191111
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJan 25 '21 at 12:14
Run Duration259 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$150
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Memory 84.3
1-Core 126
2-Core 236
83% 149 Pts
4-Core 457
8-Core 778
75% 618 Pts
64-Core 1,034
64% 1,034 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1491 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.1.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
59% Above average
Lighting 76.3
Reflection 68.2
Parallax 101
62% 81.9 fps
MRender 67.5
Gravity 80.4
Splatting 51.4
53% 66.4 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 59%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2275 816 817 814 812 818 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
308% Outstanding
Read 2,629
Write 2,406
Mixed 1,922
SusWrite 1,059
448% 2,004 MB/s
4K Read 69.1
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 92.5
310% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,038
DQ Write 838
DQ Mixed 944
705% 940 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 308%
Great: 355%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$104
11GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,369
Write 1,212
Mixed 842
253% 1,141 MB/s
4K Read 58.6
4K Write 150
4K Mixed 77.5
268% 95.4 MB/s
DQ Read 970
DQ Write 982
DQ Mixed 993
742% 982 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76
146GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 476 483 485 437 322 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 510
Write 487
Mixed 428
SusWrite 444
105% 467 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 59.6
199% 69.1 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 359
DQ Mixed 361
274% 368 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 126%
Great: 129%
Seagate IronWolf 2TB (2016)-$65
197GB free
Firmware: SC60
SusWrite @10s intervals: 159 160 163 163 162 163 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 168
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 162
106% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 97%
Great: 100%
Seagate FireCuda 2.5" 2TB-$79
974GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 114 111 113 115 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 72.7
Write 118
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 113
65% 89.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1.2
224% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 68%
WD WD5000LPLX-00ZNTT0 500GB
41GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 87 88 88 88 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 104
Write 112
Mixed 64.7
SusWrite 87.6
68% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
163% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMU16GX4M2C3200C16 CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 CMU16GX4M2C3200C16 CMU16GX4M2C3000C15 32GB
3066, 3066, 3066, 3066 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
MC Read 38.3
MC Write 34.9
MC Mixed 32.7
101% 35.3 GB/s
SC Read 26.7
SC Write 32.8
SC Mixed 27.1
82% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 73
55% 73 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X470 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B78) Builds (Compare 1,306 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING PRO CARBON (MS-7B78)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $530
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback