Asus PRIME B550M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive122% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME B550M-K  (all builds)
Memory20.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210322
Uptime4.1 Days
Run DateNov 23 '23 at 17:07
Run Duration499 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Memory 73.7
1-Core 157
2-Core 283
92% 171 Pts
4-Core 515
8-Core 851
83% 683 Pts
64-Core 1,113
69% 1,113 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 99%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$30
157GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM12.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 272 261 255 251 235 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 810
Write 498
Mixed 506
SusWrite 262
115% 519 MB/s
4K Read 38
4K Write 93.5
4K Mixed 38.2
156% 56.6 MB/s
DQ Read 649
DQ Write 526
DQ Mixed 275
291% 483 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 122%
Great: 223%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
233GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 393 273 273 272 272 301 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 279
Mixed 349
SusWrite 297
79% 352 MB/s
4K Read 39.9
4K Write 77.9
4K Mixed 49.5
165% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 357
DQ Mixed 233
212% 323 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 105%
Great: 118%
WD Black SN750 SE NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$70
466GB free
Firmware: 711130WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1918 1916 1487 124 121 122 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
232% Outstanding
Read 1,744
Write 1,830
Mixed 1,509
SusWrite 948
339% 1,508 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 110
4K Mixed 61.6
203% 71.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,042
DQ Write 808
DQ Mixed 907
683% 919 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 232%
Great: 296%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE640 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: MJAONS04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 155 156 157 159 154 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Read 141
Write 136
Mixed 73.6
SusWrite 156
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
164% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 91%
Hitachi HUS724040ALE640 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: MJAONS04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 161 161 159 162 161 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
95.4% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 168
Mixed 87.2
SusWrite 161
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
173% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 95.4%
Great: 91%
General UDisk 17TB
14TB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 16 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
42.7% Average
Read 18.4
Write 14.9
Mixed 16.6
SusWrite 15.9
22% 16.5 MB/s
4K Read 12.9
4K Write 10.9
4K Mixed 11.8
820% 11.9 MB/s
DQ Read 13
DQ Write 11.4
DQ Mixed 12
844% 12.1 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 42.7%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
81.1% Excellent
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 29
83% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 24.5
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 92.6
43% 92.6 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 81.1%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 47 11 60 0" 1280 720
Typical PRIME B550M-K Builds (Compare 2,768 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 99%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus PRIME B550M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $386
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback