Asus E3M-ET V5 SERIES

Performance Results


Gaming 24% Surfboard	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 21% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	28.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	96.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

6 months ago, 6 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus E3M-ET V5 SERIES (all builds)
Memory	25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit 种颜色
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170122
Uptime	11.3 Days
Run Date	Nov 23 '23 at 09:38
Run Duration	143 Seconds
Run User	CHN-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1270 v5 1,290 User benchmarks, average bench 78% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	74.1% Very good	Memory 81 1-Core 109 2-Core 202 75% 131 Pts	4-Core 363 8-Core 589 58% 476 Pts	64-Core 584 36% 584 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 74.1% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 546.17 Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	28.1% Poor	Lighting 35.2 Reflection 40.1 Parallax 37.6 29% 37.6 fps	MRender 37.3 Gravity 37.3 Splatting 26.8 27% 33.8 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$69 60,851 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 176GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 370 360 354 365 365 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	96.7% Outstanding	Read 432 Write 372 Mixed 320 SusWrite 364 84% 372 MB/s	4K Read 28.8 4K Write 83.9 4K Mixed 36.7 135% 49.8 MB/s	DQ Read 374 DQ Write 329 DQ Mixed 258 219% 320 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 96.7% Great: 130%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$31 89,637 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 171GB free Firmware: SC13 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 83 84 82 84 83 MB/s Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	46.4% Average	Read 78.8 Write 73.1 Mixed 47.6 SusWrite 82.9 52% 70.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 60%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$97 74,038 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 905GB free Firmware: MX6OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 110 112 106 112 109 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	62.2% Good	Read 107 Write 101 Mixed 30.9 SusWrite 110 63% 87.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 154% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 62.2% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown TAC4U3200E18321C 1x31GB 10 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 1 of 2 slots used 31GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	MC Read 13.8 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 11.2 37% 12.9 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 13.1 SC Mixed 12.1 35% 12.3 GB/s	Latency 82.3 49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 64%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	59	60	24.1"	1280 720	PHL0871 Philips 240SW

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical E3M-ET V5 SERIES Builds (Compare 15 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 18%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus E3M-ET V5 SERIES

CPU
Core i5-6500Intel $60Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	4x
Core i7-6700Intel $170Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	2x
Xeon E3-1220 v5IntelBench 73%, 1,202 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	3x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	1x
NVS 510NvidiaBench 3%, 2,450 samples	1x

SSD
PLUS 240GBSandiskBench 45%, 86,316 samples	2x
CV1-8B128 122GBLiteonBench 74%, 20 samples	2x
SL300 120GBColorfulBench 61%, 1,356 samples	1x

RAM
ValueSelect DDR4 2400 C16 1x16GBCorsairBench 43%, 816 samples	2x
Aegis DDR4 2666 C19 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 81%, 7,702 samples	2x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX $125Bench 73%, 59,072 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $119

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16