Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics89% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive37.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200422
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 23 '23 at 04:55
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 88.8
1-Core 119
2-Core 229
82% 146 Pts
4-Core 333
8-Core 414
48% 373 Pts
64-Core 514
32% 514 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$273
Gigabyte(1458 37D9) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.17
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 123
Parallax 110
91% 115 fps
MRender 133
Gravity 92.8
Splatting 92.2
85% 106 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 39 141 197 62 200 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 301
Write 9.5
Mixed 19.4
SusWrite 125
24% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 29.7
4K Mixed 19.3
43% 16.9 MB/s
DQ Read 60.6
DQ Write 98.3
DQ Mixed 149
93% 103 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 102%
Kingston SA400S37480G 960GB
106GB free
Firmware: SBFKZ1.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 363 411 408 418 430 427 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 184
Write 65.2
Mixed 33.9
SusWrite 410
39% 173 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 13.2
4K Mixed 9.2
37% 11.5 MB/s
DQ Read 13.6
DQ Write 13.4
DQ Mixed 12.9
10% 13.3 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 103%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$63
146GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 106 112 132 113 118 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
50% Above average
Read 58.8
Write 56.4
Mixed 57.3
SusWrite 116
53% 72 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.1
66% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 50%
Great: 90%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$28
36GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 90 91 90 90 89 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 99.8
Write 93.4
Mixed 64
SusWrite 90.3
64% 86.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
206% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2666 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
63.8% Good
MC Read 24.5
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 21.3
65% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 19.5
50% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 52%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 165 23.8" 1280 720 VIE2022 R200s
Typical TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR Builds (Compare 1,837 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360M-PLUS GAMING/BR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $461
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback