MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 145%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics150% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive424% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory58 GB free of 64 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231019
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 22 '23 at 23:04
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Memory 81.5
1-Core 105
2-Core 213
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 845
75% 634 Pts
64-Core 2,155
133% 2,155 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
150% Outstanding
Lighting 208
Reflection 190
Parallax 232
169% 210 fps
MRender 291
Gravity 163
Splatting 122
149% 192 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 150%
Great: 157%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
452GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2004 2723 3641 2329 968 901 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
424% Outstanding
Read 3,680
Write 3599
Mixed 2,766
SusWrite 2,094
681% 3,035 MB/s
4K Read 67.2
4K Write 195
4K Mixed 89.9
320% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,327
DQ Write 940
DQ Mixed 1,036
800% 1,101 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 424%
Great: 623%
Acclamator 120GB 120GB
84GB free
Firmware: SBFQ01.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 114 108 112 111 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
72% Very good
Read 388
Write 300
Mixed 287
SusWrite 129
62% 276 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 69.1
4K Mixed 27.8
115% 41.7 MB/s
DQ Read 286
DQ Write 333
DQ Mixed 198
180% 272 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 72%
Great: 92%
Crucial P5 Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
931GB free
Firmware: P7CR403 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1684 1865 2008 2014 2002 1419 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
305% Outstanding
Read 1,747
Write 1,682
Mixed 1,675
SusWrite 1832
391% 1,734 MB/s
4K Read 60.3
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 81.5
269% 93.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,027
DQ Write 763
DQ Mixed 868
656% 886 MB/s
Poor: 215%
This bench: 305%
Great: 537%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 156 159 157 161 155 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Read 102
Write 119
Mixed 75.9
SusWrite 156
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
88% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-3600C18-32GVK 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
121% Outstanding
MC Read 49.5
MC Write 43.4
MC Mixed 44
130% 45.6 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 26.6
SC Mixed 36.7
84% 29.3 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 121%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 60 120 31.5" 1280 720 ACR0000 ED320QR S
Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 17,588 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $898
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback