Gigabyte GA-AERO 15-SA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 111%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics138% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AERO 15-SA  (all builds)
Memory54 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190701
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateNov 22 '23 at 22:02
Run Duration225 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Memory 89.9
1-Core 119
2-Core 199
80% 136 Pts
4-Core 366
8-Core 519
56% 443 Pts
64-Core 576
36% 576 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Gigabyte(1458 75A1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
66% Good
Lighting 81.1
Reflection 90.6
Parallax 78
66% 83.2 fps
MRender 97.7
Gravity 77.3
Splatting 70.8
66% 81.9 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 66%
Great: 72%
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
Gigabyte(1458 4113) ≥ 4GB; GV-N406TAERO OC-16GD
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
138% Outstanding
Lighting 189
Reflection 175
Parallax 203
154% 189 fps
MRender 242
Gravity 160
Splatting 119
136% 174 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 138%
Great: 157%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Gigabyte(1458 75A1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2125
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.4% Terrible
Lighting 5.5
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 7.7
4% 7.27 fps
MRender 9.9
Gravity 6.4
Splatting 9.7
7% 8.67 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.4%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$157
129GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1036 1098 1184 1161 1134 689 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 1,649
Write 1,772
Mixed 1,188
SusWrite 1,050
318% 1,415 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 65.1
4K Mixed 46
150% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 716
DQ Write 505
DQ Mixed 621
461% 614 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 204%
Great: 372%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$159
794GB free
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1822 1821 1836 1560 1840 1839 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
261% Outstanding
Read 1,744
Write 1,676
Mixed 1,702
SusWrite 1,786
390% 1,727 MB/s
4K Read 40
4K Write 74.8
4K Mixed 53.8
169% 56.2 MB/s
DQ Read 748
DQ Write 558
DQ Mixed 648
486% 651 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 261%
Great: 435%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G4SFD8266.C16FE 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 26.5
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 35.2
SC Mixed 25.9
75% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 70.6
57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5AB8 LG IPS FULLHD
Typical GA-AERO 15-SA Builds (Compare 98 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AERO 15-SA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 617% - Outstanding Total price: $4
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback