Gigabyte GA-AERO 15-SA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 96%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics137% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AERO 15-SA  (all builds)
Memory34.6 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190701
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateNov 22 '23 at 21:50
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 87.1
1-Core 115
2-Core 148
72% 117 Pts
4-Core 261
8-Core 456
43% 358 Pts
64-Core 617
38% 617 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)
Gigabyte(1458 75A1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
66.3% Good
Lighting 81.4
Reflection 90.2
Parallax 77.9
66% 83.2 fps
MRender 98.2
Gravity 77.4
Splatting 72
66% 82.5 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 72%
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
Gigabyte(1458 4113) ≥ 4GB; GV-N406TAERO OC-16GD
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
137% Outstanding
Lighting 187
Reflection 174
Parallax 202
152% 188 fps
MRender 240
Gravity 158
Splatting 115
133% 171 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 137%
Great: 157%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Gigabyte(1458 75A1) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2125
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
5.37% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 8.4
Parallax 7.4
5% 7.13 fps
MRender 9.5
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 9.5
7% 8.37 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.37%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$159
126GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1142 1106 1148 1092 877 568 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 2,017
Write 1,968
Mixed 1,480
SusWrite 989
362% 1,614 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 74.2
4K Mixed 52.7
171% 56.4 MB/s
DQ Read 746
DQ Write 535
DQ Mixed 656
486% 646 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 223%
Great: 372%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$150
794GB free
Firmware: 4B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1796 1807 1789 1529 1790 1791 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
277% Outstanding
Read 1,990
Write 1,978
Mixed 1,894
SusWrite 1,750
429% 1,903 MB/s
4K Read 47.7
4K Write 78
4K Mixed 59.9
190% 61.9 MB/s
DQ Read 792
DQ Write 591
DQ Mixed 678
511% 687 MB/s
Poor: 223%
This bench: 277%
Great: 435%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT32G4SFD8266.C16FE 2x31.5GB
2 of 4 slots used
63GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 26.1
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 35.8
SC Mixed 25.5
75% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 58 60 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5AB8 LG IPS FULLHD
Typical GA-AERO 15-SA Builds (Compare 97 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AERO 15-SA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 617% - Outstanding Total price: $4
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $250Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback