Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	5.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	87.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

PC Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-1235U 8,532 User benchmarks, average bench 60% U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	28.1% Poor	Memory 31.8 1-Core 139 2-Core 226 68% 132 Pts	4-Core 139 8-Core 155 19% 147 Pts	64-Core 298 18% 298 Pts
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics 18,007 User benchmarks, average bench 13% Legend(17AA 50A6) 1GB Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	5.4% Terrible	Lighting 5.9 Reflection 9.3 Parallax 8.6 5% 7.93 fps	MRender 8.1 Gravity 9.7 Splatting 6.7 7% 8.17 fps
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 5.4% Great: 18%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZAL4256HBJD-00BL1 256GB 67 User benchmarks, average bench 164% 120GB free (System drive) Firmware: CL2QHXC7 SusWrite @10s intervals: 282 323 303 377 675 570 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	87.3% Excellent	Read 858 Write 602 Mixed 528 SusWrite 422 134% 603 MB/s	4K Read 19.7 4K Write 27.3 4K Mixed 20.4 70% 22.5 MB/s	DQ Read 182 DQ Write 60.2 DQ Mixed 113 85% 118 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 87.3% Great: 234%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 2x4GB 26,749 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 2 of 8 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	56.2% Above average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 26.4 MC Mixed 23.3 65% 22.6 GB/s	SC Read 5.6 SC Write 7.9 SC Mixed 8.7 21% 7.4 GB/s	Latency 172 23% 172 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 56.2% Great: 86%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	56	60	13.3"	1280 720	LEN41A0

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 16%

Surfboard

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

CPU
Core i5-1235UIntelBench 60%, 8,532 samples	9x

GPU
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 13%, 18,007 samples	9x

SSD
LA KIOXIA 256GBKbg5aznt256gBench 151%, 115 samples	4x
CL4-4D256-Q79 256GBSsstcBench 141%, 38 samples	3x
MZAL4256HBJD-00BL1 256GBSamsungBench 164%, 67 samples	2x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CWE 2x4GBSamsungBench 72%, 26,749 samples	7x
HMA851S6DJR6N-XN 2x4GBHynixBench 71%, 7,522 samples	2x