Lenovo 82LN

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.77% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive139% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
23 months ago, 23 months ago.
SystemLenovo 82LN  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 21 '22 at 13:03
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 47.8
1-Core 114
2-Core 231
68% 131 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 695
68% 560 Pts
64-Core 920
57% 920 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 3F95) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.30.14.10
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
8.77% Terrible
Lighting 8.9
Reflection 16.6
Parallax 31.3
7% 18.9 fps
MRender 10.8
Gravity 25.7
Splatting 8.4
12% 15 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.77%
Great: 17%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Umis RPJTJ512MEE1OWX 512GB
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.1C0628
SusWrite @10s intervals: 425 383 312 296 238 325 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Read 1,130
Write 704
Mixed 780
SusWrite 330
164% 736 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 79
4K Mixed 50.3
169% 56.9 MB/s
DQ Read 557
DQ Write 381
DQ Mixed 305
272% 414 MB/s
Poor: 121%
This bench: 139%
Great: 210%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CWE 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB Row of chips DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
59.4% Above average
MC Read 25.2
MC Write 17.8
MC Mixed 24.4
64% 22.5 GB/s
SC Read 10.6
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 14.8
42% 14.8 GB/s
Latency 169
24% 169 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59.4%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82LN Builds (Compare 438 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 82LN

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback