Apple MacPro5,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics34.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemApple MacPro5,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-F221BEC8
Memory30.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 15:52
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5690
CPU-A (00), 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 87.1
1-Core 87.2
2-Core 179
69% 118 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 525
55% 439 Pts
64-Core 645
40% 645 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
EVGA(3842 0969) 2GB
CLim: 1372 MHz, MLim: 1914 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.64
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
34.5% Below average
Lighting 42.7
Reflection 64.7
Parallax 55.7
35% 54.4 fps
MRender 29.4
Gravity 51.6
Splatting 41.7
34% 40.9 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34.5%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$80
865GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 218 218 219 217 218 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65.5% Good
Read 236
Write 220
Mixed 227
SusWrite 218
51% 225 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 56.4
4K Mixed 39.4
128% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 37.3
DQ Write 86.2
DQ Mixed 53.3
43% 58.9 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 125%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
2TB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 189 188 189 188 189 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Read 191
Write 192
Mixed 30.3
SusWrite 189
108% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
159% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 109%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.1% Below average
MC Read 15
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 12.9
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 4.8
SC Mixed 8
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 7.2" 1280 720 SAM04FB SAMSUNG
Typical MacPro5,1 Builds (Compare 923 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

System: Apple MacPro5,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 122% - Outstanding Total price: $210
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback