Apple MacPro5,1

Performance Results


Gaming 29% Raft	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 25% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	35% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago, 8 months ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

System	Apple MacPro5,1 (all builds)
Motherboard	Apple Mac-F221BEC8
Memory	29.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180919
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 21 '23 at 14:52
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (57^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon X5690 4,873 User benchmarks, average bench 75% CPU-A (00), 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	77.6% Very good	Memory 89.1 1-Core 88.8 2-Core 176 70% 118 Pts	4-Core 357 8-Core 516 55% 436 Pts	64-Core 649 40% 649 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360 38,995 User benchmarks, average bench 32% EVGA(3842 0969) 2GB CLim: 1322 MHz, MLim: 1697 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.64 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	35% Below average	Lighting 40.7 Reflection 61.6 Parallax 53 33% 51.8 fps	MRender 54.7 Gravity 49.4 Splatting 39.9 38% 48 fps
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 35%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$80 202,785 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 865GB free (System drive) Firmware: M3CR022 SusWrite @10s intervals: 218 218 218 219 218 218 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	65.9% Good	Read 236 Write 218 Mixed 226 SusWrite 218 51% 225 MB/s	4K Read 31.4 4K Write 57 4K Mixed 39.9 129% 42.8 MB/s	DQ Read 37 DQ Write 83.8 DQ Mixed 54.8 43% 58.5 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 125%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61 100,891 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2TB free Firmware: MX4OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 188 189 188 189 189 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 191 Write 189 Mixed 28.1 SusWrite 189 108% 149 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.6 159% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x8GB 41,916 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	37.2% Below average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 11.1 MC Mixed 13.2 37% 13 GB/s	SC Read 9.8 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 7.9 21% 7.5 GB/s	Latency 69.8 57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	58	60	7.2"	1280 720	SAM04FB SAMSUNG

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MacPro5,1 Builds (Compare 923 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 44%

Speed boat

System: Apple MacPro5,1

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56901stBench 72%, 2,873 samples	210x
Xeon X5690IntelBench 75%, 4,873 samples	126x
CPU: Intel Xeon X56801stBench 71%, 2,389 samples	60x

GPU
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	254x
RX 590AMD $80Bench 57%, 122,060 samples	57x
HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples	52x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $80Bench 385%, 327,441 samples	47x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	26x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	21x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	108x
8x8GBUnknownBench 94%, 4,255 samples	67x
3x16GBUnknownBench 61%, 613 samples	56x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 122% - Outstanding

Total price: $210

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235	Nvidia RTX 4070 $499	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342