Apple MacPro5,1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive64.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemApple MacPro5,1  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-F221BEC8
Memory30.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180919
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 13:14
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5690
CPU-A (00), 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 63.3
1-Core 89.6
2-Core 176
61% 109 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 529
55% 440 Pts
64-Core 662
41% 662 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
EVGA(3842 0969) 2GB
CLim: 1317 MHz, MLim: 1677 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.64
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
34.8% Below average
Lighting 40.6
Reflection 60.5
Parallax 52.5
33% 51.2 fps
MRender 53.5
Gravity 49.1
Splatting 39.8
38% 47.5 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 34.8%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$80
865GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR022
SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 203 206 211 211 211 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
64.5% Good
Read 234
Write 211
Mixed 220
SusWrite 208
49% 218 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 55.8
4K Mixed 38.9
127% 42 MB/s
DQ Read 37.3
DQ Write 84.3
DQ Mixed 51
42% 57.5 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 64.5%
Great: 125%
Toshiba P300 2TB-$61
2TB free
Firmware: MX4OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 186 189 189 188 189 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 177
Write 190
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 188
104% 144 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.6
159% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 104%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
25.3% Poor
MC Read 10
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 10.4
26% 9.13 GB/s
SC Read 6
SC Write 2.7
SC Mixed 5
13% 4.57 GB/s
Latency 118
34% 118 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 25.3%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 58 60 7.2" 1920 1080 SAM04FB SAMSUNG
Typical MacPro5,1 Builds (Compare 923 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

System: Apple MacPro5,1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 122% - Outstanding Total price: $210
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $85
Intel Core i5-13600K $235Nvidia RTX 4070 $499Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $342
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback