PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 28.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 87.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING (all builds) |
Memory | 8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180221 |
Uptime | 4.8 Days |
Run Date | Nov 21 '23 at 12:07 |
Run Duration | 135 Seconds |
Run User | ITA-User |
Background CPU | 18% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
87.5%
Excellent
|
83% 147 Pts
|
69% 548 Pts
|
40% 654 Pts
|
Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.5%
Poor
|
29% 37.5 fps
|
27% 33.8 fps
|
|
![]() Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
|
5.66%
Terrible
|
5% 7.07 fps
|
6% 7.57 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
290GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 176 341 371 218 207 MB/s
|
87.5%
Excellent
|
83% 370 MB/s
|
125% 42.6 MB/s
|
212% 307 MB/s
|
![]() Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
163GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 441 451 455 345 323 315 MB/s
|
101%
Outstanding
|
92% 410 MB/s
|
141% 48.2 MB/s
|
266% 356 MB/s
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Kingston KHX2400C15/8G KHX2666C16/8G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
41.7%
Average
|
39% 13.6 GB/s
|
40% 13.9 GB/s
|
60% 67 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0% | 0% | 0 | 70 | 58 | 60 | 27.2" | 1280 720 | GSM5BB7 LG ULTRAGEAR |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 551x |
Core i5-8400Intel $102Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 264x |
Core i7-8700Intel $166Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 262x |
![]() |
|
---|---|
RTX 2060Nvidia $234Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 220x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 154x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $139Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 109x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 93% - Outstanding | Total price: $520 |