Asus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics28.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive83.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory6.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180221
Uptime4.8 Days
Run DateNov 21 '23 at 11:56
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 32%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$152
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 91.9
1-Core 117
2-Core 229
83% 146 Pts
4-Core 462
8-Core 635
69% 549 Pts
64-Core 660
41% 660 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 89%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$100
Asus(1043 862A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.4% Poor
Lighting 35.8
Reflection 39.6
Parallax 37.2
29% 37.5 fps
MRender 37.4
Gravity 37.8
Splatting 26.6
27% 33.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.4%
Great: 33%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Relative performance (0th percentile)
2.34% Terrible
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 7.2
Parallax 7.5
0% 4.97 fps
MRender 6.2
Gravity 6.1
Splatting 10.6
6% 7.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.34%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TB
290GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415020WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 192 211 220 214 231 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
83.7% Excellent
Read 434
Write 419
Mixed 274
SusWrite 219
75% 337 MB/s
4K Read 28.2
4K Write 59.3
4K Mixed 36.4
121% 41.3 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 235
205% 307 MB/s
Poor: 65%
This bench: 83.7%
Great: 117%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$50
163GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 423 438 441 337 323 320 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
99.3% Outstanding
Read 442
Write 408
Mixed 426
SusWrite 380
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 33.1
4K Write 67.1
4K Mixed 40.1
137% 46.8 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 352
265% 355 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 99.3%
Great: 129%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15/8G KHX2666C16/8G 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.6% Average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 14.4
MC Mixed 12
39% 13.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 14.5
SC Mixed 14.6
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 72
56% 72 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 12 211 55 60 27.2" 1280 720 GSM5BB7 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical TUF B360-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 1,869 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B360-PLUS GAMING - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $649
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $270Nvidia RTX 4060 $299Crucial MX500 250GB $30
Intel Core i5-12400F $148Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $299Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $199Nvidia RTX 3060 $290Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $49
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $50G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $357SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback