Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics55.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte AB350-Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170818
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 20 '23 at 14:11
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
79% Very good
Memory 70.6
1-Core 117
2-Core 232
76% 140 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 692
72% 581 Pts
64-Core 886
55% 886 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 79%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
CLim: 1436 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Lighting 71.3
Reflection 65.6
Parallax 94.8
58% 77.2 fps
MRender 66.8
Gravity 74.8
Splatting 49.7
51% 63.8 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 960G 960GB
808GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T200121a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 456 323 182 183 182 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
90.8% Outstanding
Read 478
Write 462
Mixed 391
SusWrite 276
90% 402 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 77.7
4K Mixed 40.2
141% 50 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 292
209% 264 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 90.8%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
722GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 197 199 200 200 201 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 198
Write 159
Mixed 85.3
SusWrite 199
117% 160 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
167% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 114%
Great: 113%
WD Elements 25A3 6TB
4.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 175 174 173 172 173 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 192
Write 172
Mixed 131
SusWrite 173
223% 167 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 12.3
4K Mixed 1.1
531% 11.2 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 9.9
DQ Mixed 0.9
370% 3.8 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 108%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
75.4% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 27.7
MC Mixed 25.2
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 29.1
SC Mixed 23
68% 24 GB/s
Latency 99.3
40% 99.3 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 75 27" 1280 720 ACR058F Acer KG271
Typical GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 2,733 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF - $90

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $461
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback