Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics52.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive90.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte AB350-Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory28.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170818
Uptime1 Days
Run DateNov 19 '23 at 09:31
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
79.2% Very good
Memory 70.9
1-Core 118
2-Core 235
77% 141 Pts
4-Core 470
8-Core 700
73% 585 Pts
64-Core 891
55% 891 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 31.0.12027.9001
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.8% Above average
Lighting 66.5
Reflection 63.6
Parallax 99.9
54% 76.7 fps
MRender 65.4
Gravity 75.9
Splatting 47.6
50% 63 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 960G 960GB
811GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T200121a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 462 442 186 182 180 180 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Read 450
Write 453
Mixed 389
SusWrite 272
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 32.3
4K Write 78.4
4K Mixed 40.9
143% 50.5 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 289
209% 267 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 108%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
722GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 199 200 200 196 198 202 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 100
Mixed 83
SusWrite 199
106% 146 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 114%
Great: 113%
WD Elements 25A3 6TB
4.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 174 173 173 171 173 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 178
Write 172
Mixed 107
SusWrite 173
211% 157 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 12
4K Mixed 1.1
474% 6.9 MB/s
DQ Read 0.6
DQ Write 10
DQ Mixed 1
376% 3.87 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 102%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 CMK16GX4M2D3000C16 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 CMK16GX4M2B3000C15 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
75.4% Very good
MC Read 28.2
MC Write 27.8
MC Mixed 25.2
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 28.9
SC Mixed 23.2
68% 24 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 75.4%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 75 27" 1280 720 ACR058F Acer KG271
Typical GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 2,787 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF - $90

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $458
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $72
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback