Gigabyte B450M DS3H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 50%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics62.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemGigabyte B450M DS3H
MotherboardGigabyte B450M DS3H  (all builds)
Memory14.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220217
Uptime4 Days
Run DateNov 20 '23 at 12:54
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$200
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
74.3% Very good
Memory 65.7
1-Core 114
2-Core 226
73% 135 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 732
72% 588 Pts
64-Core 1,218
75% 1,218 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Nvidia(10DE 153C) ≥ 4GB; ichill
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.17
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
62.7% Good
Lighting 69
Reflection 31
Parallax 167
56% 88.9 fps
MRender 30
Gravity 135
Splatting 102
75% 89 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WD20EZBX-00AYRA0 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 219 219 215 216 219 218 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
40.8% Average
Read 201
Write 216
Mixed 157
SusWrite 218
45% 198 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 14.3
4K Mixed 1.3
72% 19 MB/s
DQ Read 1.7
DQ Write 8
DQ Mixed 1.2
2% 3.63 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 46%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
14GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,406
Write 942
Mixed 1,455
351% 1,601 MB/s
4K Read 57.9
4K Write 152
4K Mixed 81.7
273% 97.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,143
DQ Write 921
DQ Mixed 985
750% 1,016 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3600C18-16GTZN F4-3600C16-16GTZNC 32GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
63.8% Good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 25.1
65% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 25.2
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 109
36% 109 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 131%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 36 30 240 26.5" 1280 720 GSM5B8E 27GN7
Typical GA-B450M DS3H-CF Builds (Compare 16,627 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte B450M DS3H - $84

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $427
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback