Asus P8P67

Performance Results


Gaming 58% Gunboat	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 44% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	79.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	65.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 7 months ago, 6 months ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67 (all builds)
Memory	16.1 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110302
Uptime	0.9 Days
Run Date	Nov 18 '23 at 16:03
Run Duration	198 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	72.9% Very good	Memory 91.3 1-Core 85.1 2-Core 168 69% 115 Pts	4-Core 317 8-Core 320 42% 318 Pts	64-Core 317 20% 317 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 36FC) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23 Performing below potential (50^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	79.1% Very good	Lighting 97.7 Reflection 108 Parallax 97.9 80% 101 fps	MRender 92.2 Gravity 98.1 Splatting 95.7 78% 95.3 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 38GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 162 193 232 242 248 237 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	65.4% Good	Read 342 Write 241 Mixed 248 SusWrite 219 59% 262 MB/s	4K Read 25.3 4K Write 44.3 4K Mixed 29.7 100% 33.1 MB/s	DQ Read 181 DQ Write 144 DQ Mixed 160 120% 162 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 65.4% Great: 124%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$100 80,665 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 428GB free Firmware: SVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 122 138 141 116 40 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	29.9% Poor	Read 252 Write 142 Mixed 172 SusWrite 109 38% 169 MB/s	4K Read 27.3 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 4 48% 11.2 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 128%
WDC WD20 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 2TB 22 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 997GB free, PID 0c31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 19 19 20 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	14.1% Very poor	Read 55 Write 26 Mixed 26 SusWrite 19.1 38% 31.5 MB/s	4K Read 3 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.9 55% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 21%
Samsung SSD 870 EVO 1TB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 656GB free, PID 2336 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 21 21 21 22 22 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	21.4% Poor	Read 55 Write 27.7 Mixed 29.8 SusWrite 21.2 41% 33.4 MB/s	4K Read 11.1 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 6.6 334% 6.57 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 21.4% Great: 49%
WDC WD20 EFRX-68EUZN0 2TB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 69GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 19 19 19 19 20 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	14% Very poor	Read 55.5 Write 26 Mixed 23.8 SusWrite 19.1 37% 31.1 MB/s	4K Read 2.2 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.9 52% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 14% Great: 52%
WDC WD10 EARS-00Y5B1 1TB 80 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 156GB free, PID 0c31 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 15 16 16 16 15 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	13.8% Very poor	Read 61.2 Write 17.7 Mixed 17.2 SusWrite 15.2 30% 27.8 MB/s	4K Read 6.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.3 35% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown F3-12800CL10S-8GBX F3-12800CL10S-8GBX F3-12800CL9-2GBXL F3-12800CL9-2GBXL 20GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 8192, 8192, 2048, 2048 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	40.9% Average	MC Read 13.7 MC Write 14.4 MC Mixed 12.3 38% 13.5 GB/s	SC Read 11.5 SC Write 13.3 SC Mixed 13.4 36% 12.7 GB/s	Latency 66.4 60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 40.9% Great: 38%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	71	59	60	27"	1280 720	BNQ8038 BenQ PD2725U

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,501 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	447x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	359x
Core i7-2600Intel $199Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	200x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	118x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	104x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	97x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	49x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	47x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	33x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	39x
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	35x
XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 4,223 samples	24x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 54% - Above average

Total price: $666

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16