Asus P8P67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 37%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics77.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive57.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67  (all builds)
Memory16.6 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110302
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 07 '23 at 09:02
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 93%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
62.5% Good
Memory 76.2
1-Core 72.7
2-Core 161
60% 103 Pts
4-Core 284
8-Core 277
38% 281 Pts
64-Core 280
17% 280 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 62.5%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
77.9% Very good
Lighting 97.7
Reflection 109
Parallax 92.2
80% 99.5 fps
MRender 92.9
Gravity 85.9
Splatting 93.9
75% 90.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 77.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 191 211 221 187 139 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 322
Write 191
Mixed 236
SusWrite 175
52% 231 MB/s
4K Read 24.4
4K Write 35
4K Mixed 26
89% 28.5 MB/s
DQ Read 182
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 111
93% 136 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 124%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$100
357GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 123 128 125 124 111 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23% Poor
Read 124
Write 89.7
Mixed 129
SusWrite 118
26% 115 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.8
40% 9.37 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 23%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL10S-8GBX F3-12800CL10S-8GBX F3-12800CL9-2GBXL F3-12800CL9-2GBXL 20GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.7% Poor
MC Read 10.8
MC Write 10.8
MC Mixed 9.6
30% 10.4 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 8.5
24% 8.23 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 38%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 36 16 60 27" 1280 720 BNQ8038 BenQ PD2725U
Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,501 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $666
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback