Empty empty

Performance Results


Gaming 79% Battleship	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 78% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	34.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	80GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 80GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Empty empty (all builds)
Motherboard	TYAN S7012
Memory	66.4 GB free of 80 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20110923
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 18 '23 at 12:40
Run Duration	213 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	27%

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5690 2,873 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPU 0, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.45 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	72.4% Very good	Memory 89.8 1-Core 90.1 2-Core 180 71% 120 Pts	4-Core 297 8-Core 577 52% 437 Pts	64-Core 1,218 75% 1,218 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 72.4% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480 20,231 User benchmarks, average bench 122% XFX(1EAE 6606) ≥ 4GB Ram: 12GB, Driver: 23.11.1 Performing below potential (5^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	111% Outstanding	Lighting 116 Reflection 127 Parallax 282 94% 175 fps	MRender 220 Gravity 141 Splatting 192 151% 185 fps
Poor: 113% ↑ This bench: 111% Great: 129%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$97 129,044 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 516GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 77 72 77 78 80 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	34.6% Below average	Read 204 Write 194 Mixed 176 SusWrite 76.1 36% 163 MB/s	4K Read 16.6 4K Write 25.3 4K Mixed 18.9 63% 20.3 MB/s	DQ Read 27.9 DQ Write 70.2 DQ Mixed 33.7 30% 43.9 MB/s
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 34.6% Great: 137%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 549GB free Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 142 143 142 143 146 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.9% Below average	Read 202 Write 194 Mixed 184 SusWrite 143 41% 181 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 25.1 4K Mixed 19.9 60% 19.7 MB/s	DQ Read 28.5 DQ Write 64.9 DQ Mixed 36.7 31% 43.4 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 37.9% Great: 133%
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$370 9,454 User benchmarks, average bench 117% 2TB free Firmware: SVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 78 77 78 79 79 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	38.4% Below average	Read 204 Write 191 Mixed 182 SusWrite 78.2 37% 164 MB/s	4K Read 20.1 4K Write 26.6 4K Mixed 22.6 74% 23.1 MB/s	DQ Read 37.7 DQ Write 70.8 DQ Mixed 46.5 38% 51.7 MB/s
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 137%
WDC WUH722020ALE6L4 20TB 64 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1TB free Firmware: PQGNW107 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 140 141 142 143 145 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	19.3% Very poor	Read 190 Write 190 Mixed 103 SusWrite 142 35% 156 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 11.7 4K Mixed 1 9% 4.63 MB/s	DQ Read 1.1 DQ Write 16.7 DQ Mixed 0.5 3% 6.1 MB/s
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 30%
WD Blue 4TB (2015)-$85 124,615 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2.5TB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 123 125 123 126 123 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	68.7% Good	Read 115 Write 120 Mixed 66.8 SusWrite 124 78% 106 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.9 182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 68.7% Great: 101%
TUF ESD-T1A 2TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 2TB free, PID 1a8a Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	17.4% Very poor	Read 54.5 Write 24.2 Mixed 26.6 SusWrite 21 38% 31.6 MB/s	4K Read 10.6 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 5.8 264% 5.73 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 78%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70CH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70CH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B1K70DH0-YH9 M393B... 80GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	40.1% Average	MC Read 15.7 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 13 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 5.3 19% 6.8 GB/s	Latency 68.3 59% 68.3 ns
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 40.1% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	70	58	75	24"	1920 1009	SAM0F5E S24D332

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical empty Builds (Compare 558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 61%

Destroyer

Workstation 8%

Tree trunk

System: Empty empty

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	38x
Core i7-2620MIntelBench 52%, 16,111 samples	26x
Core i5-2520MIntel $34Bench 48%, 45,308 samples	22x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	52x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	34x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	32x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	13x
120G 120GBHs-ssd-c100Bench 66%, 4,962 samples	11x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	10x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	42x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	29x
1x8GBUnknownBench 38%, 168,538 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369