Honor FRI-FXX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics8.46% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive226% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHonor FRI-FXX  (all builds)
MotherboardHONOR FRI-FXX-PCB
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230922
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 18 '23 at 04:04
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12450H
CPU0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
90.5% Outstanding
Memory 65.7
1-Core 176
2-Core 341
100% 194 Pts
4-Core 617
8-Core 942
97% 780 Pts
64-Core 1,168
72% 1,168 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 90.5%
Great: 96%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(1EE7 2034) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4032
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
8.46% Terrible
Lighting 8
Reflection 15.2
Parallax 9.3
6% 10.8 fps
MRender 16.8
Gravity 14.8
Splatting 13.8
12% 15.1 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.46%
Great: 15%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Ssstc CL4-8D512 512GB
396GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EV27705
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1248 1399 1190 1454 1427 756 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
226% Outstanding
Read 1,908
Write 1591
Mixed 1,196
SusWrite 1,246
333% 1,485 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 37.3
175% 64.6 MB/s
DQ Read 663
DQ Write 285
DQ Mixed 572
398% 507 MB/s
Poor: 155%
This bench: 226%
Great: 319%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H54G56CYRBX247N 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 4267 MHz clocked @ 4266 MHz
Performing below potential (82nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
132% Outstanding
MC Read 46.8
MC Write 56.4
MC Mixed 50.6
146% 51.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.3
SC Write 42.7
SC Mixed 26
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 91%
This bench: 132%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 14" 1280 720 BOE0B8F
Typical FRI-FXX Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Honor FRI-FXX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback