HP ProDesk 400 G6 MT

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive31.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP ProDesk 400 G6 MT  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8599
Memory7.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230621
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 16 '23 at 10:34
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User MAR-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9500
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
80.8% Excellent
Memory 79.3
1-Core 121
2-Core 240
81% 147 Pts
4-Core 460
8-Core 549
65% 505 Pts
64-Core 566
35% 566 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 80.8%
Great: 94%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Afox 500GB 500GB
217GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1128B0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 355 104 14 16 22 17 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
31.2% Below average
Read 373
Write 297
Mixed 17.4
SusWrite 88
43% 194 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 13.4
4K Mixed 0.4
33% 10.2 MB/s
DQ Read 79.6
DQ Write 16.9
DQ Mixed 0.5
13% 32.3 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 31.2%
Great: 74%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
104GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 96 94 89 96 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
55% Above average
Read 96.9
Write 89.7
Mixed 62.7
SusWrite 94.2
63% 85.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
211% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 55%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x8000] Samsung M378A5244CB0-CTD 12GB
2400, 2667 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.6% Good
MC Read 24.2
MC Write 26.3
MC Mixed 20.8
68% 23.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 25.8
SC Mixed 18.2
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 78.6
51% 78.6 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 15 11 64 0" 1280 720
Typical ProDesk 400 G6 MT Builds (Compare 458 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProDesk 400 G6 MT

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback