MSI MS-16J5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics4.4% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive74.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star GP62 6QE
MotherboardMSI MS-16J5  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151027
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 14 '23 at 15:16
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 29%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6300HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
60.9% Good
Memory 77.3
1-Core 79.3
2-Core 160
62% 105 Pts
4-Core 256
8-Core 273
35% 265 Pts
64-Core 271
17% 271 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
MSI(1462 115A) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4454
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
4.4% Terrible
Lighting 4.7
Reflection 6
Parallax 5
4% 5.23 fps
MRender 6.5
Gravity 4.5
Splatting 8.5
6% 6.5 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.4%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX300 SATA M.2 525GB-$140
52GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 373 387 376 264 251 250 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
74.8% Very good
Read 389
Write 286
Mixed 311
SusWrite 317
73% 326 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 46.2
4K Mixed 25
83% 29.6 MB/s
DQ Read 329
DQ Write 302
DQ Mixed 316
237% 316 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 74.8%
Great: 98%
OLEANE 256GB
227GB free
Firmware: U0401A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 359 348 370 376 379 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
69.2% Good
Read 408
Write 337
Mixed 302
SusWrite 365
79% 353 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 51.3
4K Mixed 15.7
70% 27.4 MB/s
DQ Read 121
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 29.6
76% 153 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 69.2%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFD8213.C16FHP Samsung M471A1G43DB0-CPB 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
68.3% Good
MC Read 23.6
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 23.4
71% 24.8 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 25
SC Mixed 20
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 94.6
42% 94.6 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 48 15.5" 1280 720 AUO71EC
Typical MS-16J5 Builds (Compare 1,644 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16J5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback