Gigabyte GA-B650M AORUS PRO AX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 166%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 156%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics153% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive573% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B650M AORUS PRO AX  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230710
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 13 '23 at 17:15
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User DZA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 7600-$149
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 81.5
1-Core 195
2-Core 346
111% 208 Pts
4-Core 724
8-Core 1089
113% 907 Pts
64-Core 1,330
82% 1,330 Pts
Poor: 94%
This bench: 108%
Great: 116%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti-$385
Asus(1043 892E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4500 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
153% Outstanding
Lighting 212
Reflection 196
Parallax 215
173% 208 fps
MRender 304
Gravity 169
Splatting 125
154% 199 fps
Poor: 126%
This bench: 153%
Great: 157%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme XPG GAMMIX S70 B 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.2.F.83 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4521 4593 4617 4644 4641 4648 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
573% Outstanding
Read 2,508
Write 4,640
Mixed 2,900
SusWrite 4,611
835% 3,665 MB/s
4K Read 72
4K Write 247
4K Mixed 107
377% 142 MB/s
DQ Read 1,990
DQ Write 1,385
DQ Mixed 1,652
1,243% 1,676 MB/s
Poor: 136%
This bench: 573%
Great: 579%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AX5U6000C3616G-BLAWH 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
165% Outstanding
MC Read 60.1
MC Write 60.7
MC Mixed 57.9
170% 59.6 GB/s
SC Read 55.1
SC Write 57.2
SC Mixed 54.5
159% 55.6 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 151%
This bench: 165%
Great: 213%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 72 60 60 21.5" 1280 720 PHLC0AC 227E4LH
Typical GA-B650M AORUS PRO AX Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 271%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 117%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 275%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B650M AORUS PRO AX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $1,119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback