Asrock X470 Taichi Ultimate

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X470 Taichi Ultimate  (all builds)
Memory18.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190718
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 11 '23 at 11:20
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$199
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
76.2% Very good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 108
2-Core 203
74% 130 Pts
4-Core 396
8-Core 671
65% 533 Pts
64-Core 1,083
67% 1,083 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195
MSI(1462 3363) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2512 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 546.01
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Lighting 142
Reflection 152
Parallax 141
116% 145 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 146
Splatting 124
105% 129 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,022
Write 1,773
Mixed 1,424
387% 1,739 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 68.8
4K Mixed 48.7
163% 53.2 MB/s
DQ Read 466
DQ Write 277
DQ Mixed 391
286% 378 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
SanDisk Ultra 3D 2TB-$135
200GB free
Firmware: X61170RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 310 318 306 322 322 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 344
Write 339
Mixed 272
SusWrite 315
72% 317 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 44
4K Mixed 28.5
95% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 232
DQ Write 132
DQ Mixed 207
147% 190 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 119%
Amd-raid Array 1 10TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.3 24 6.3 5.7 6.8 21 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
33.3% Below average
Read 104
Write 34.7
Mixed 34.7
SusWrite 11.8
34% 46.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.6
122% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.3%
Great: 68%
Amd-raid Array 2 4TB
1TB free
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 56 101 90 95 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
49% Average
Read 86.7
Write 120
Mixed 63.6
SusWrite 83.8
65% 88.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 49%
Great: 195%
WDC WD20 EADS-00R6B0 2TB
1TB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 98 97 96 97 95 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
42.5% Average
Read 101
Write 100
Mixed 68.9
SusWrite 96.1
123% 91.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
101% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
MC Read 36.6
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 33.3
95% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 22.1
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 24.6
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 84.8
47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 64 52 60 24.1" 1280 720 ENC1909 CG241W
Typical X470 Taichi Ultimate Builds (Compare 123 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Taichi Ultimate

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $705
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback