Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics76.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive229% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemRazer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer DA550
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200604
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 10 '23 at 22:30
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 91.6
1-Core 129
2-Core 249
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 651
68% 545 Pts
64-Core 787
49% 787 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 2070 with Max-Q Design
Device(1A58 2011) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.4601
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.5% Very good
Lighting 91.6
Reflection 94.5
Parallax 95
75% 93.7 fps
MRender 131
Gravity 88.2
Splatting 82.8
80% 101 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 76.5%
Great: 90%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 892 616 616 571 577 580 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
229% Outstanding
Read 1,933
Write 1,842
Mixed 1,369
SusWrite 642
324% 1,447 MB/s
4K Read 53.2
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 68
224% 76.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,116
DQ Write 813
DQ Mixed 930
704% 953 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 229%
Great: 296%
USB DISK 2.0 64GB
43GB free, PID 1621
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.8 3.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
1.98% Terrible
Read 3.5
Write 0.2
Mixed 0.2
SusWrite 4.5
2% 2.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 1.98%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NMSO480E82-3200E 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
74.2% Very good
MC Read 29
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 20.2
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 31.2
SC Mixed 23.7
67% 23.6 GB/s
Latency 66.8
60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 144 15.5" 1280 720 BOE0804
Typical Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328 Builds (Compare 2,042 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade 15 Base Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-0328

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback