Today's hottest deals

Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-033

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics89.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive291% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemRazer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-033  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer CH551
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200720
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 28 '22 at 20:05
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10875H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 92
1-Core 135
2-Core 249
90% 159 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 627
60% 494 Pts
64-Core 561
35% 561 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080S (Super Mobile Max-Q)
Device(1A58 200A) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 30.0.15.1179
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89.6% Excellent
Lighting 109
Reflection 132
Parallax 118
89% 119 fps
MRender 142
Gravity 103
Splatting 96.4
91% 114 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 89.6%
Great: 106%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB1T0HBLR-00A00 1TB
881GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXF7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1856 1932 1478 1477 1476 1462 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
291% Outstanding
Read 2,028
Write 1,792
Mixed 1,523
SusWrite 1,614
391% 1,739 MB/s
4K Read 56.5
4K Write 99.4
4K Mixed 74
233% 76.6 MB/s
DQ Read 990
DQ Write 717
DQ Mixed 779
602% 829 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 291%
Great: 329%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown NMSO480E82-3200E 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.4% Good
MC Read 23.5
MC Write 21.6
MC Mixed 19.4
61% 21.5 GB/s
SC Read 11.3
SC Write 34.2
SC Mixed 25.6
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 64.1
62% 64.1 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 64.4%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-033 Builds (Compare 1,349 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

System: Razer Blade 15 Advanced Model (Early 2020) - RZ09-033

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $238Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback