Asus CG8270

Performance Results


Gaming 20% Surfboard	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	52% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 months ago, 6 months ago.

System	Asus CG8270 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK CG8270
Memory	1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120829
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 04 '23 at 14:36
Run Duration	130 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	0%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	76.3% Very good	Memory 92 1-Core 99.5 2-Core 175 73% 122 Pts	4-Core 329 8-Core 476 50% 403 Pts	64-Core 481 30% 481 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 76.3% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% MSI(1462 3281) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 545.92 Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	52% Above average	Lighting 72.3 Reflection 64.7 Parallax 68.6 59% 68.5 fps	MRender 66.3 Gravity 0.2 Splatting 68.1 38% 44.9 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 52% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 59GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT06B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 46 51 50 70 86 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	36.4% Below average	Read 123 Write 45.5 Mixed 71.5 SusWrite 56 16% 74 MB/s	4K Read 21.9 4K Write 31.1 4K Mixed 14.6 68% 22.5 MB/s	DQ Read 297 DQ Write 51.3 DQ Mixed 43 65% 130 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 73%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 341GB free Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 148 167 141 165 165 MB/s Performing above expectations (79^th percentile)	92.3% Outstanding	Read 163 Write 131 Mixed 31.8 SusWrite 159 87% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.5 122% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 92.3% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 99U5402-461.A00LF 1x4GB 61 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	27.6% Poor	MC Read 9.1 MC Write 8.4 MC Mixed 7.6 24% 8.37 GB/s	SC Read 8.5 SC Write 9.2 SC Mixed 8.1 25% 8.6 GB/s	Latency 64.8 62% 64.8 ns
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 27.6% Great: 29%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	69	58	60	19"	1280 720	FUS07C0 B19-5 ECO

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical CG8270 Builds (Compare 293 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 76%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

System: Asus CG8270

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	228x
Core i5-3350PIntel $60Bench 65%, 21,413 samples	18x
Core i5-3450Intel $59Bench 66%, 34,199 samples	10x

GPU
GTX 660Nvidia $170Bench 20%, 123,956 samples	36x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	29x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	16x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	14x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	13x
MZ7TE128HMGR-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 62%, 5,980 samples	11x

RAM
SLA302G08-GGNHC 2x4GBUnknownBench 54%, 1,334 samples	13x
SLA302G08-GGNHC 4x4GBUnknownBench 56%, 881 samples	12x
EL64C1C1624Z1 2x4GBAdataBench 55%, 601 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 46% - Average

Total price: $567

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16