Asus CG8270

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 15%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics52.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive25.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 months ago, 5 months ago.
SystemAsus CG8270  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK CG8270
Memory0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120829
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 04 '23 at 14:29
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 32%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
54.3% Above average
Memory 65.1
1-Core 63.2
2-Core 165
55% 97.8 Pts
4-Core 236
8-Core 331
36% 284 Pts
64-Core 425
26% 425 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 545.92
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.1% Above average
Lighting 72.6
Reflection 75.3
Parallax 76.3
59% 74.7 fps
MRender 64.8
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 68.5
38% 44.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 52.1%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT06B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 41 33 37 31 36 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
25.2% Poor
Read 156
Write 50.7
Mixed 59.6
SusWrite 35.5
16% 75.5 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 12.4
4K Mixed 10
29% 9.6 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 54.8
DQ Mixed 19.9
53% 120 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 73%
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
350GB free
Firmware: MS1OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 36 72 48 92 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
17.7% Very poor
Read 1.2
Write 91.8
Mixed 3.5
SusWrite 60.2
28% 39.2 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.1
37% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5402-461.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
22.4% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 6.9
21% 7.2 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 3.6
SC Mixed 6.5
14% 4.97 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 13%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 32 5 60 19" 1280 720 FUS07C0 B19-5 ECO
Typical CG8270 Builds (Compare 292 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

System: Asus CG8270

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $567
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback