Asus PRIME Z370-A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics58.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z370-A  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.5 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kolorów, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171201
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 02 '23 at 22:12
Run Duration164 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 38%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$191
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
74% Very good
Memory 74.7
1-Core 116
2-Core 219
76% 136 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 585
61% 490 Pts
64-Core 808
50% 808 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 74%
Great: 100%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2052 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.40
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.6% Above average
Lighting 72.8
Reflection 75.3
Parallax 69.2
59% 72.4 fps
MRender 67.4
Gravity 73.7
Splatting 68.6
57% 69.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 60%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
6.59% Terrible
Lighting 7.1
Reflection 9.9
Parallax 8.5
6% 8.5 fps
MRender 11.3
Gravity 6.9
Splatting 11.3
8% 9.83 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.59%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,632
Write 1328
Mixed 569
259% 1,176 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 50
179% 67.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,096
DQ Write 939
DQ Mixed 779
649% 938 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
330GB free
Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 993 1009 1029 1005 1041 986 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
207% Outstanding
Read 953
Write 889
Mixed 1,045
SusWrite 1,010
220% 974 MB/s
4K Read 45.9
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 61.2
204% 71.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,182
DQ Write 771
DQ Mixed 1,021
750% 991 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 207%
Great: 365%
Seagate ST31000520AS 1TB-$250
278GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 74 85 86 89 80 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 97.8
Write 93.1
Mixed 54.7
SusWrite 82.6
60% 82 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 62%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80
878GB free
Firmware: MX6OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 117 135 127 158 146 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
60.6% Good
Read 74.9
Write 121
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 137
64% 89.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
46% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3466 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3467 MHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
77.4% Very good
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 29.7
MC Mixed 27.6
86% 30 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 19
SC Mixed 10.8
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 79
51% 79 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 116%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 58 144 31.5" 1280 720 SAM0E14 C32HG7x
Typical PRIME Z370-A Builds (Compare 11,319 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z370-A - $132

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $930
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $252Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback