Lenovo 20EQS6NV00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 20EQS6NV00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20EQS6NV00
Memory27.1 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221206
Uptime2.2 Days
Run DateNov 01 '23 at 20:30
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User ARE-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6820HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
64.2% Good
Memory 71.6
1-Core 86.9
2-Core 164
62% 107 Pts
4-Core 306
8-Core 480
48% 393 Pts
64-Core 494
31% 494 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 222E) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9865
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.05% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 7.1
Parallax 6.2
5% 6.3 fps
MRender 7.2
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 8.8
6% 7.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.05%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
VTB512GSSD4 512GB
35GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0714C0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,558
Write 629
Mixed 234
174% 807 MB/s
4K Read 33.2
4K Write 54.2
4K Mixed 14.2
97% 33.9 MB/s
DQ Read 600
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 481
339% 439 MB/s
Poor: 113% Great: 216%
Kingston OM8SBP3512K-AH 512GB
250GB free
Firmware: HPS2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 517 478 255 255 259 255 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 1,360
Write 1,235
Mixed 835
SusWrite 336
210% 942 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 81
4K Mixed 17.3
111% 42.9 MB/s
DQ Read 628
DQ Write 355
DQ Mixed 477
359% 487 MB/s
Poor: 88%
This bench: 129%
Great: 207%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD M471A2K43BB1-CRC Kingston HP26D4S9S8ME-8 Hynix HMA41GS7AFR8N-TF 40GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.8% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 12.1
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 12.6
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 93.1
43% 93.1 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 43.8%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 207 56 60 15.6" 1280 720 LEN40BD
Typical 20EQS6NV00 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 20EQS6NV00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback